210208Re: RBL question and their performance stats for me
- Dec 1, 2006On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 08:55:22AM +0100, Erwan David wrote:
> > They have not launched a marketing campaign telling everyone to switch,#
> > but they have on various fora said that zen is ready and live, and that
> > there is no reason to not switch from sbl-xbl to zen.
> Except if you do not want to filter what PBL filters.
# SpamHaus SBL
# SpamHaus XBL, CBL portion
# SpamHaus XBL, NJABL portion
# SpamHaus PBL
These five restrictions cost only one DNS lookup, and one can decide which
of the five to use (order not significant). I don't know definitively
which of the PBL IPs signals volunteered data and which signals SpamHaus
additional data, but it is reasonable to assume that the two distinct
IP addresses are reserved for a reason.
Given that 127.0.0.2 and 192.0.2.0 map to 127.0.0.11, and these are not
volunteered by their ISPs, it looks .11 is SpamHaus data, and .10 is
SpamHaus is not in the business of making it difficult for users to
use their lists by mixing oil and water...
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>