198415Re: [long] Re: Greylisting and Postfix
- Jun 4, 2006Michael J Wise wrote:
> On Jun 1, 2006, at 3:01 PM, Alex Satrapa wrote:so what? spamcop isn't designed for smtp level rejection. it should ony
>> And here's why greylisting doesn't work:
>>> Received: from optkmv.ru (opttorg.cust.kmv.ru [184.108.40.206])
> % query-dnsbl 220.127.116.11
> SPAMCOP opttorg.cust.kmv.ru
be used in score based system.
>use a spam filter. There are many to choose from. if you don't like
> Greylisting should never be one's only line of defense.
> Greylisting buys one time for a given IP address to make a fool of
> itself elsewhere before it gets to dump crap into your system.
> Or at least, that is my understanding of its purpose.
>> Note that they reconnected after a couple of hours, ...
> Not surprised at all.
> It's almost certainly a compromised machine ... in Mother Russia!
> Listening on port 22, btw.
> Probably user 'diana' had a trivial password ('password' or 'diana',
> for example), and ... poof, in they went.
>> Is there anything else here that could have indicated to my mail
>> server that this was not legitimate mail?
choosing, try spamassassin...
>There may be more spam servers in the US than in Russia. Again, you can
> Um, how about the fact that the server was in Russia?
use such arguments in a score based filter, not in
- << Previous post in topic