Re: No Obama
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Waldo O" <americanbookmoghuls@...>
>I agree. We don't need anything here that will generate needless,
> Who cares? You wanna talk politics..start a politics podcast.
> Lets get back to things that don't involve controversy.
long-winded threads that end up in shouting matches.
So, what's the best microphone for under $125?
(sorry, couldn't resist)
- --- In email@example.com, "Pat Cook" <patsblogs@...> wrote:
>ANYTHING past them at THIS point. The Republicans will do ANYTHING to
> Hi everyone:
> Ya think he works for the McCain/Palin campaign? I wouldn't put
maintain their hold on what little influential power they have left
(Which they have been gradually losing since the primaries began).
>You sound just as bad. No party would sanction this; it's the work of
an individual with their own ideas.
I won't be voting for either candidate--I'm Canadian. :)
And the idea of Internet regulation isn't that far off. In Canada the
CRTC (Canada's FCC) is seriously looking into Internet regulation. But
it's more about access to material such as porn or the amount of
foreign content than it is about free speech.