Re: [podcasters] Re: New Website Lets You Create Podcasts From A Webpage
- Steve has valid points here, Joe, and maybe I don't. I see it as useful
in special cases, on-the-fly remotes where ones usual tools aren't
available, but I don't see it as a day-to-day mechanism for creating final-
form podcasts. The initial voice recording, speech only, is just a start.
There is one sort of podcast where I can see a use for something like
this, maybe. "Five Minute Memoir," for example, is generally an audio
recording of one story by one person who, well, has one brief story to
share, but no plans to do an ongoing podcast, kinda like a very long voice-
I still think this might be a starting point for a voice-comment
mechanism, though. Wish I could remember that one site that promised a
semi-turnkey voice commenting system. Don't recall the name, and when I
stumbled across it it wasn't up and running yet -- don't know if they ever
finished it, for that matter. Anyway, I can see a use for having a widget
on my Libsyn site that can record voice comments but host them elsewhere --
don't want to tie up part of my show-hosting space with voice comment
Now there's an idea, promoting-wise. Do a blog on a near-and-dear topic.
have a link for voice comments there on the blogsite, that goes back to
your voice-recording system. With enough voice comments, assemble them,
and your responses, into a podcast. It's a start, if you have an
attractive topic you can do well.
Likewise, such a voice-comment mechanism might be useful for shows (like
mine) that have tried the K7 phone numbers but never got called. Might
have a better response level if it's all web-based, since it wouldn't
involve long-distance and/or international calls. And the audio quality
might well be higher with such a mechanism than with a phone voicemail, or
with Skype & Talkshoe & such.
If you're really satisfied you can cope with the hosting duties for
(potentially) so many files, generate a personalized link for each show
that records their show's comments into their own FTP-accessible folders.
Even a show with lots of comments can just FTP in and grab their stack of
MP3s en masse. If used, it could get massive in a hurry, though.
I admit, I don't know much more about Java than that it's a bad idea to
put in cream and sugar. But I believe the script runs on the client
computer, right? So in this context, a script that allows the selection
(from a pull-down list?) of the 'cast to whom the comment is directed
would be handy...
Hey, waitaminute. Script generates the MP3, saves it on your site, person
who recorded it provides an email address, and your system emails a link
to the file to that address. Or attaches the file itself, if practicable.
You've already got the recording and hosting part done, how hard is
generating an email with a link to a file in it? The email address could
be provided automagically by clicking an icon on the show's site -- the
comment address is already pretty public, anyway -- calling the script
with the email address as a parameter.
Make that work, I'd sure try it out.
It was 29 Dec 2007, when Stephen Eley commented:
> You're not a podcaster, are you, Joe?--
> Podcasters aren't using your service for their podcasts because what
> you're providing, while it may be functional for what it does, isn't
> what podcasters need.
> Learn more about podcasting, listen to a number of podcasts, and think
> about the sound files others are producing and whether you can adapt your
> tool to match typical use cases. No one's going to adapt their use cases
> to match your tool.
> Good luck.
> On 12/29/07, Joe Thompson <onlymejoet@...> wrote:
> > OK David, we agree that I've got something useful here. So the next
> > question is:
> > How do I let people find out about it and start using it?
> > I've done the usual stuff - submitted the site to the search engines,
> > mentioned it on a few forums and newgroups but I need to somehow get the
> > word out to the people who would actually use it - the budding
> > podcasters.
> > I've got a fair number of people who drop by, record a test message (And
> > if I hear "Testing 1, 2, 3, 4" again I might scream") but very few
> > regular users.
> > David Smith <dbsmith@...> wrote:
> > It was 28 Dec 2007, when Joe Thompson commented:
> > > Sadly not inventing code, just adapting code that I bought off some
> > clever
> > > Ukrainians. And I do have complete rights to do whatever I see fit
> > > with
> > the
> > > actual JAVA app.
> > So, you have some room for play there. Still good.
> > > I thought of the blog angle as well but isn't that already offered as
> > > a standard service on most blogs? At least it is with Live Journal on
> > > a
> > paid
> > > account. (By phone I think.)
> > Linking to a file, sure. Having the ability to go to the website,
> > RECORD THE SHOW and have it already hosted in accessible space, then
> > create the blog entry to point to the audio file created instants ago...
> > Creating a whole podcast from scratch with one website visit? This is
> > being done where, exactly?
> > > "I'd come up with a logo/link combination as a moderately high
> > > priority,
> > > and make that part of your TOS, so that people who use your hosting
> > > also link back and identify your site. Sure hope the folks providing
> > > your hosting are very forgiving. If it works as it could, this could
> > explode."
> > >
> > > I currently provided an embedded player for people to cut'n'paste into
> > > their blogs. I could adapt that to display a link back to the site. As
> > for
> > > traffic, I currently have 5 terabytes of monthly bandwidth and that
> > > increases at 40 gig per week, If I go o ver that, I'm charged at 10
> > > cents per gig but I'm sure I could come to some sort of deal with
> > > Dreamhost.
> > Lots of podcast sites have an embedded player. How many have an
> > imbedded recorder? I recall seeing recently a service to allow voice
> > comments on blogs via the web. This I haven't seen, though.
> > > It would be nice if the site became popular and if it does take off
> > > and
> > I'm
> > > getting hit with high bandwidth charges then I'd probably look for
> > partners
> > > to help me offset the cost.
> > I see a place and a market for it. But you might note I'm not an
> > independently wealthy and successful dot-com entrepreneur, so apparently
> > my judgement on such things might be suspect.
> > > I still don't see this service as a commercial service though, just
> > > something to help people get into the world of Podcasting.
> > And how many already existing services are trying to do exactly that,
> > and have to say, "first, you go off to some other site, download some
> > complex software, figure out how to create an MP3 file and save it, then
> > you come back to us and we'll show you how to do the rest, which you
> > might well be able to figure out, since you hadda learn how to use
> > Audacity from scratch..."
> > > One thing I would be interested in though, is seeing what the
> > > recording quality of the app is like with a decent microphone. I'm
> > > currently using
> > a
> > > cheap headset mic and that sounds OK.
> > I just might give it a shot. Don't need an external mechanism for
> > recording, but I can see the potential here.
> > For that matter, it would be cool to use a similar mechanism to create
> > voice comments for existing podcasts. Need to have that
> > getting-the-file thing working, though. Where can I get mine? <grin>
Grizzly's Growls -- The Life and Times of a Minor Local
Listen or Subscribe:
- Hey, waitaminute.
First of all, you were presenting your basic recording-via-a-JAVA-script
website as a tool for creating podcasts. MyChingo is -not- for creating
podcasts, if I recall it correctly -- I stumbled across whatever-I-found
back before they actually offered anything, years ago -- it was a
mechanism for creating voice comments on a blogsite or podcast site.
You had decided you were a place to record podcasts. Different process.
And I'd imagine Google works at your house, just as it works as mine, and
you could have found MyChingo the same way I did, or Steve did. And all
the other hopefuls who are creating stuff on the web and hope people will
What Steve did was respond to MY post trying to recall the service I
stumbled across -- doing web searches -- years back. I thank Steve for
making the effort, though I'm not sure that's the one I recall.
So, Steve should apologize to you for how he replied to my post? I don't
think so, and I'll say that in front of God, and everybody I know in 20
So, back-the-f***-up. Now that we've settled that Steve didn't respond to
-my- post to offend -you-, What was your question (he said, menacing and
Seriously, though, you have the beginnings of a tool to do something, and
I'm still not sure what. Voice commenting is one of the possibilities I
can forsee, and if I'm not mistaken, I was the person who said that might
be a good option for you to pursue. (and I'm still sure there's more
So, if when I suggest an idea, your response is to use it to justify an
attack on a friend of mine, why am I still listening? Why is anybody here
So... Given that you've thought better of your previous post (as I would
have), how can I help?
It was 1 Jan 2008, when Joe Thompson commented:
> So there's another service out there doing pretty much what I'm doing
> (except it's subscription based and the recordings are limited to 1 meg)
> and you're saying that it's successful? And "for some time" actually means
> since April 2007.
> You can't have it both ways. You've been pouring cold water on what I'm
> doing since this thread started and yet you use an example of somebody
> using very similar technology to "prove" that what I'm doing is a waste of
> I wonder if there's any connection between you and Mychingo.
> Stephen Eley <SFEley@...> wrote: On Dec
> 31, 2007 2:18 PM, David Smith <dbsmith@...> wrote:
> > I still think this might be a starting point for a voice-comment
> > mechanism, though. Wish I could remember that one site that promised a
> > semi-turnkey voice commenting system. Don't recall the name, and when I
> > stumbled across it it wasn't up and running yet -- don't know if they
> ever > finished it, for that matter.
> MyChingo, and it's been in production and used by many podcasters for some
The Life and Times of a Minor Local Celebrity
Listen or Subscribe: