30391RE: [podcasters] Re: Feedburner help
- Jun 4, 2007Dan
You and I are on the same page but Marshall is a fan of the product so you
are not going to convince him or a lot of other people otherwise. At
RawVoice We actually poll FeedBurner feeds on a different schedule we have
to give the feeds longer to load because we used to get so many timeouts
that it caused server loading. Average website RSS feed loads in about 2-7
seconds. The feedburner feeds has forced us to increase the feed load time
to as long as 40 seconds. Luckily lots of options out there.
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On
Behalf Of Dan Kuykendall
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: [podcasters] Re: Feedburner help
this blog post just screams out for a rebuttal to crappy reasons listed.
1) There are plenty of stats plugins to every popular blogging platform
out there. The way this is phrased makes it seem like only feedburner
gives you this data
2) Actually, I find it the opposite. With IE7 and Firefox2 which have
RSS readers and dont use the stylesheet anymore... the feedburner pages
are standard and all the template stuff with the helpful info is
completely lost. This lack of control is exactly why feedburner tends to
be a bad choice
3) Again, this is easy to accomplish on popular blogging platforms.
4) These features are also available in other popular blogging
platforms. And there is no need to manage separate settings and
additional steps if you just have users go to your direct feed
5) As long as you maintain domains you wont lose subscribers. But if
your using feedburner and then decide to stop... you will certainly lose
some subscribers. And now that they are owned by google, Im even more
wary of the havoc they can reap.
Additionally feedburner has caused so many problems for people its
amazing its still as popular as it is. I know software has bugs, and
podPress has caused some feed errors from time to time. But at least
when podpress does it, its only to a single blog and rolling back to an
older version can be done to get back up. When feedburner has caused
problems, and my users freak out... theres nothing that can be done
except wait and hope things get fixed soon.
Now keep in mind, I dont care if people want to use feedburner, and I
dont have any real animosity toward them. They are a good solution for
some... but I want people to understand what benefits and what
heartaches they provide so that users can make informed choices.
Dan Kuykendall (aka Seek3r)
http://www.mightyse <http://www.mightyseek.com> ek.com
In God we trust, all others we virus scan.
Programmer - an organism that turns coffee into software.
> Here's a post on how and why to use Feedburner. got enough inbound linksthat it's the
> #1 google result for both questionscom/how-and-why-to-use-feedburner
> http://marshallk. <http://marshallk.com/how-and-why-to-use-feedburner>
>"David Smith" <dbsmith@...> wrote:
> --- In podcasters@yahoogro <mailto:podcasters%40yahoogroups.com> ups.com,
>> It was 1 Jun 2007, when Steven R. Boyett commented:by
>>> <<Wait, Google bought Feedburner -and- Google bought Libsyn?>>
>>> Wizzard Media bought Libsyn.
>> Yeah, I figured that out today. Google's provided info on their plans for
>> Feedburner makes my brain itch; I don't get exactly how things are going
>> to change there, with all their talk about feed-based advertising. When I
>> saw a link right on the sign-in page to opt out of the service entirely
>> June 15, alarm bells started going off.feedburner.com/grizzlysgrowls>
>> And I don't even want to look into this Wizzard Media thing. I like
>> Feedburner, but I need Libsyn. But maybe it'll all be okay.
>> Grizzly <grizzly at grizzly.podzone.org>
>> <http://feeds. <http://feeds.feedburner.com/grizzlysgrowls>
>> <http://feeds. <http://feeds.feedburner.com/grizzlysblog>
>> The Life and Times of a Minor Local Celebrity[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> Yahoo! Groups Links
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>