Yeah, sorry axxin. I should have made that a bit clearer. It is the
transcript of the hearing before Judge Biernat, where the Judge
originally granted Michael a new trial. It is not the decision of the
Appellate Court. I did not include the first two or the last page of
the transcript due to my discomfort of posting the addresses of the
parties involved and the signatures of the Court Reporter and Court Clerk.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org
, "axxinjaxxin" <axxinjaxxin@...>
> Just for clarification, the transcript referred to below is the
> transcript of the September 12, 2008 hearing before Judge Biernat, not
> the transcript before the State Court of Appeals. I read through the
> entire transcript and feel embarrassed that I didn't make the
> connection sooner. I work as a court stenographer and have done so
> for the better part of five years now, and noted that pages one and
> two were missing, so it took a little longer for everything to click.
> Anywho, thank you for this transcript. I think it proves that Judge
> Biernat still has a firm grasp over his courtroom and intends to be
> fair in the upcoming new trial.
> --- In email@example.com, "uss_escort" <uss_escort@> wrote:
> > Folks,
> > Just wanted to spread the word that the Michigan State Court of
> > Appeals upheld Judge Biernat's decision to grant Michael a new trial.
> > If anyone is interested, the court transcript of that hearing is
> > posted at fatrepublicanclub.wordpress.com.