Re: Lotus edulis
> But I wonder why one would want to grow this - due to the small pods -Caragana arborescens would be great, and I prefer perennial species if
> rather laborious annual, unless sandy, stony or rocky soil is all you
> have - where it may self-seed.
> If I would get reasonably cold winters, I would prefer to grow the
> Caragana arborescens - Siberian Pea Tree.
I can grow them. Unfortunately, at this point I move around every
couple years and so I am more restricted to annual species. I will be
sure to add Caragana arborescens to the "if I ever settle down" plant
- "edulis" in a botanical name only means that some part of the plant (or animal) is edible - not necessarily the whole plant (or animal).
For instance, Pinus edulis has edible pine nuts, you can't eat the needles or the trunk.
There is a clam that has a botanical name that includes "edulis" - you wouldn't eat the clam shell.
(horticulturist & M.G.)
--- On Sun, 8/3/08, v.scherrer <vital233@...> wrote:
From: v.scherrer <vital233@...>
Subject: [pfaf] Re: Lotus edulis
Date: Sunday, August 3, 2
--- In pfaf@yahoogroups. com, "Geir Flatabø" <geirf@...> wrote:
> Are you sure it is only the pod that denominates the name "edulis",
> might it not be
> that the whole plant is edible ???
I don't think that "edulis" necessarily means that all parts are
edible, but at:
http://epic. kew.org/searchep ic/detailquery. do;jsessionid= 73EEC88396D7D40C 8AE79005B6CCC1C6 ?requiredPage= 1&scientificName =Lotus+edulis& datasources= ipni&datasources =mc&datasources= libcat&datasourc es=ebbd&datasour ces=ecbot& datasources= livcoll&datasour ces=herbcat& datasources= sid&datasources= sepasal&datasour ces=efz&datasour ces=kewweb& categories= names&categories =bibl&categories =colln&categorie s=taxon&categori es=flora& categories= misc&detailDatas ource=sepasal
"Lotus edulis L.
Uses: FOOD(Leaves, Seeds); ANIMAL FOOD(Aerial Parts); ENVIRONMENTAL
Another issue with propagation by seed might be, or not, the right
symbiotic soil bacteria. As I made the unfortunate experience that
some nitrogen fixing plants can grow very poorly if the proper soil
bacteria associated with it is not already present in the soil. For
this reason it might be preferable to get potted plants.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> http://ecocrop.fao.org/ecocrop/srv/en/dataSheet?id=7412vital - Great links! For acid soil (if it is also sandy/rocky) and if
> For a comparison with the asparagus pea see:
you live somewhere cool enough you might consider Comptonia peregrina.
It makes great tea, fixes nitrogen (symbiotically of course) and it
is clonal so it will spread without having to seed. The Fabaceae form
symbioses with rhyzobia which are common in many soils, so I would be
surprised if the lack of their symbiont was the reason for the species
failing. The way to be more confident in that assessment is to dig
them up and see if the roots are nodulating. If they are then they
have most likely found the rhyzobia and are failing due to other
causes. Hope this helps.
- Thanks a lot! This should help.
Although I'm pretty well off with nitrogen fixing shrubs, but this
plant sounds just so irresistibly desirable - tolerant of drought, of
acid and poor soil - I've got more than I could wish for of that - and
a size which is not likely to demand any effort - definitely a must
have for my collection. Though it may not fruit due to low chill
winters, but I wouldn't expect it suffer otherwise from lack of cold.
Re rhyzobia, I read once that such plants may nodulate anyway, but
that one can tell whether they are actually fixing nitrogen, if the
nodules are brownish inside, rather than white.
According to some sources of information, even within the family of
the Fabaceae, there are many different species or genera which require
--- In email@example.com, "sjalge" <sjalge@...> wrote:
> > http://ecocrop.fao.org/ecocrop/srv/en/dataSheet?id=7412
> > For a comparison with the asparagus pea see:
> > http://ecocrop.fao.org/ecocrop/srv/en/dataSheet?id=1807
> vital - Great links! For acid soil (if it is also sandy/rocky) and if
> you live somewhere cool enough you might consider Comptonia peregrina.
> It makes great tea, fixes nitrogen (symbiotically of course) and it
> is clonal so it will spread without having to seed. The Fabaceae form
> symbioses with rhyzobia which are common in many soils, so I would be
> surprised if the lack of their symbiont was the reason for the species
> failing. The way to be more confident in that assessment is to dig
> them up and see if the roots are nodulating. If they are then they
> have most likely found the rhyzobia and are failing due to other
> causes. Hope this helps.