Re: [pfaf] Web-site redesign
- Thanks to all for the feedback. Much appreciated and helpful.
A couple of new drafts for logo attached.
In relation to specific comments
Ute Bohnsack wrote:
> How about a composite photographic banner with say 5-7 photos of some of the '5Cool, I've been think similar thoughts myself, but time and graphics
> out of 5' less well known edibles and the PFAF title superimposed.
> I'd have a go, if you like, but I lack photos of less well-known species in
> their e.g. fruiting stage.
skills limited. You can find some images at
mainly flowering plants, so maybe not the most useful ones, but..
Graham Burnett wrote:
> Wot no Flash graphics, music files and animations???? (only joking- havingWell we do have a fancy flash animation. Very similar to the
> just connected by new (to me) laptop with it's slow modem i'm reminded of
> how slow some sites are for many and thinking about a little redesign of my
> own site to make it load a bit quicker...)
but with a slight change in wording.
> text is a bit big and 'in yer face' for my liking- the screen looks a bitYep, tis a bit cluttered. I've changed things round a bit which
> cluttered at the moment. whatever you do tho DON'T put a front 'click to
> enter' page on whatever you do- if i were a casual browser I'd get bored and
> go off to look at the cramphorns site or something instead...
makes things a bit clearer. Still struggling with the problem
that we've got way to much info and I want to give everything promance,
especially the Friends of PFAF and everything else.
Personally not so keen on too involved a navigation structure, with
many sub-levels. I like to put all our wares up-front.
No chance of entry page.
Colours, and type style are still up for changes.
> > 1) Logo - banner - stuff at the topCheers.
> > We really need a good looking header for the page and the
> > stuff at the top does not do it for me. And nobody else
> > like the old banner (sulk)
> There, there, Rich, I liked it...
> I like the new PFAF logo. Maybe the diamond graphic with the treeOnly prob with diamond logo is that it only seems to work well at
> roots/branches could be more prominent- I really like that, and it would tie
> in with the (ahem) corporate image on your leaflet.
400x400 pixels or greater. Bit big for a banner.
> > "A resource centre for edible and otherwise useful plants"Yep people do seem to like it.
> > (a mouthful)
> But accurate. That's the one I'd go with. you can always change it if you
> think of something better later on...
> > "Promoting woodland gardening"Yep, only half of what we do. We do have big plans to really push
> > (not really all we do)
> No. Gives totally the wrong impression of what PFAF is all about.
this aspect of PFAF with ideas to create a fully productive woodland
garden which would be well monitored and researched. Personally I think
such a garden is really essential in helping to show the world
that WG is a practical technique, which other could follow.
> > "Edible and useful plants for a healthier world"Indeed.
> Or actually I like this one even more. It's fine that it goes with the book-
> ties in with the corporate branding bit again (yuck yuck!)
> > "Plants for a Future Species Database" (rather dull)Yep -
> Keep it. it's what people know. it's what people will type into search
> engines if they are looking for you.
> > "Natural Intentions Species database" (hum)Yep.
> Eh??? What the f*** does that mean????
One idea I had a while back was
"The Future Plants Database"
> What on earth is the Role Playing Guide To Herbs BTW?? do people standIts actually quite an interesting document. This chap has written
> around pretending to be lemon balm or something???
a 60 page list of lots of useful herbs and done a good job of editting
down the useful info. Quite a good revision if you don't want to
wade through 3500 medicinal plants.
The idea is that people who want to pretend to be druids, rangers
(aragorn in Lord of the Rings), witches etc. have a good list of
different healing and harmful herbs.
I used to do this sort of stuff in my youth and had a lot of fun.
Folks might also like to know that we've got our first published
"World Wide Web as an Aid to Search and Explore
New Plants of Global Importance"
written by a chap (A.K. Chhabra) in India, Ken and myself are
About all the different web-sites for looking for plants.
It was presented at a small confrence in India. Time permitting it
would be nice to publish a more details academic paper about the
>Some nice thoughts, bit of shaping needed, though.
> Howzabout "using plants for a sustainable future"
> "GROWING plants to make both us and the world - and
> the animals and fish - happier and generally promoting
> Demonstrating how plants can help sustain our world.
> A seedy CD from pfaf!
> Ok, not much use, but it's all ideas!
> Here's some thoughts...Cool, gave me a giggle.
> 'Edifying Edible Ecology'
> 'Harmonious Horticulture and Herbalism'
> 'Gardenning for the Fitness of your Body, Mind, and World.' ( I like that
> one )
> 'Proliferating the Planters Proragative' (yes, I am having fun, thank you
> for asking! )
I'll let folks know, when I get a bit closer, input still welcome.
it can actually work in a web browser without using the internet.
All the best for now
Plants for a Future: 7000 useful plants
Web: http://www.pfaf.org/ or http://www.comp.leeds.ac.uk/pfaf/
Snail: 1 Lerryn View, Lerryn, Lostwithiel Cornwall, PL22 0QJ
Tel: 01208 872 963 / 07813 067250
PFAF electronic mailing list http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pfaf
- --- In pfaf@y..., Richard Morris <webmaster@p...> wrote:
> Thanks to all for the feedback. Much appreciated and helpful.I like logo 2 best (not the monkey puzzle, the diamond one)
> A couple of new drafts for logo attached.
- Hi Richard,
I'm just cleaning out my mailbox and came across this:
Richard Morris wrote:
> Thanks to all for the feedback. Much appreciated and helpful.
> A couple of new drafts for logo attached.
> In relation to specific comments
> Ute Bohnsack wrote:
> > How about a composite photographic banner with say 5-7 photos of some of the '5
> > out of 5' less well known edibles and the PFAF title superimposed.
> > I'd have a go, if you like, but I lack photos of less well-known species in
> > their e.g. fruiting stage.
> Cool, I've been think similar thoughts myself, but time and graphics
> skills limited. You can find some images at
> mainly flowering plants, so maybe not the most useful ones, but..
Totally overlooked it. Do you still want me to have a go?