5770Re: [pfaf] Looking for bigger seeds and flimsier cones to develop alder as a grain crop
- Sep 27, 2011On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Michael Bell <michael@...> wrote:I've got to agree with you. My problem is growing food without the aid of chemistry and fossil fuels (most nitrogen-based fertilisers require methane for their synthesis), chestnuts grow fine at my premises but are being hit by dryocosmus kuriphilus.
I have a project to develop alder (Alnus glutinosa) as a grain crop.
My reasons for this are:-
Britain cannot feed itself because half its land is too high and cold
for grain production. This is not because this land is infertile, the
tree-line is much higher than the crop line. It is because the main
grain crops originated in the Mediterranean and they are at the limitHi Michael,I find your project fascinating. I wish you success!
* It is a tree; it can be more productive than a herb crop.
* It fixes nitrogen. Nitrate fertilisers are expensive and a big
source of CO2 production.
* It is a tree, once established it is insensitive to weather
* It is a tree, it does not need weeding and chemical weedkilling.I still don't know if my particular trees are resistant enough to survive the infestation, this year they did fine and produced a lot but I can't trust them too much. I've already noticed two smaller dead branches.Therefore I'm looking forward to growing annual and perennial herbaceous plants too.One question, does chenopodium album grow fine on the highlands too?I've found it in the Alps up to 1200-1500m.Regards,Inverse
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>