2437Re: [pfaf] Re: Biodynamics from a scientific angle
- May 8, 2008please send me a copy too!
In a message dated 5/8/2008 4:49:34 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
Thank you very much for your response, I will contact you and send
you a copy of my work at the same time as others. Together you will
form a feedback network for me, and that would be a good time to
create the website. My work has reached a point where I can prove
that the lunar cycle leaves a mark on plant life, a structural mark
which provides a stronger "physical direction" a "backbone" for
growth to develop well.
--- In _pfaf@..._ (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org) , Rick van Rein
> Hello Vic and others,
> I am responding to your message in the hope that you are being as
> as I hope you are about showing if/how biodynamics works. I thinkmany
> of us are eager to learn some hard evidence on this interestingtopic!
> > I am doing some serious research into biodynamics, particularly
> > effect of the moons phases on plant and tree growth.approached,
> That's very interesting, especially if it is scientifically
> that is: with verifying groups planten at random times butfurthermore
> under the same (documented) circumstances, with all the conditionsof the
> tests made explicit, and with an explicit hypothesis that you aretrying
> to (dis)prove based on sound statistical assumptions. Failure is toknow of.
> (dis)prove a hypthesis would also be a result, and interesting to
> The whole idea of a scientific approach is that such research couldbe
> repeated elsewhere under the same conditions, to verify if the samedo
> conclusion can be reached.
> What I'm trying to say is that you don't need to be a scientist to
> scientific research, although talking to one about your approachcould
> be useful. I'm only a PhD in computer science, making me a lesssuitable
> methodical source to talk to. I'm sure there are enough scientistsin
> botanical or farming research who would be quite willing to help youexperiences.
> come up with verifiable scientific evidence.
> > I've made some
> > great breakthroughs in this and I'd like to hear others'
> Which of course are not necessarily of a scientific nature, and
> treated accordingly unless evidence of the contrary is providedalong
> with the observations/ with the observations/<WBR>experiences. Thefar
> as I am concerned) that lots of people are waiting for is objective,biodynamics.
> comparative proofs or disprovals of the statements made by
> Totally independently, it would be interesting to know if the moon
> on water, nutrients carried in water, if it works on the seed'swillingness
> to sprout, if a cow's horn can be substituted with X, and any sucheffects
> that explain HOW things work -- but that will only secondary togardeners
> or farmers, who just want to see IF it works, based on a scientificsome
> > For those not sure what biodynamics is, email me and I will get
> > information out to you.mailing list,
> If you have a website on your work, please send a URL to the
> even if it's work in progress. It'll be great to see what is goingon,
> and where you are heading with your research.would like
> Thank you for stirring up an interesting line of discussion. I
> to get some more information on biodynamics anyway, it's a ticklingtopic
> to me.**************Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight? Get new twists on family
> Kind regards,
> Dr.ir. Rick van Rein
> The Netherlands
> _http://groengemak.http:/_ (http://groengemak.nl/en/)
favorites at AOL Food.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>