Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [pepysdiary] Re: Diary entry from February 1662/63

Expand Messages
  • Terry Foreman
    I keep learning Restoration stuff I was not taught in school. E.g., search the annotations for waterboarding. Cheers, Terry
    Message 1 of 5 , Apr 22, 2009
    • 0 Attachment
      I keep learning Restoration stuff I was not taught in school. E.g., search
      the annotations for "waterboarding."
      Cheers,
      Terry

      At 12:35 PM 4/22/2009 +0000, you wrote:
      >Terry,
      >Yes, thank you so much, now it makes perfect sense! Just when I think I've
      >learned a lot...well, now I feel silly!
      >Sincerely,
      >Marci
      >
      >--- In pepysdiary@yahoogroups.com, Terry Foreman <terry.foreman@...> wrote:
      > >
      > > MJ,
      > >
      > > Hope this helps:
      > >
      > > http://www.pepysdiary.com/about/faq/
      > >
      > > Terry Foreman
      > >
      > > At 11:49 PM 4/20/2009 +0000, you wrote:
      > > >Hello all,
      > > >I'm brand new to this group, but an old restoration history fan. Could
      > you
      > > >knowledgeable folks help me out with an idea I had? While on the Pepy's
      > > >Diary site I was reading the entry from 8 February 1662/63 and I
      > noticed a
      > > >reference to the "little Duke of Monmouth."
      > > >Am I correct in thinking that this title was not created for James Crofts
      > > >until 1663, shortly after his arrival to England?
      > > >I am very interested in the true year this entry was made. Does anyone
      > > >else have theories or opinions as to whether it was 62 or 63?
      > > >Thanks,
      > > >MJ
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >------------------------------------
      > > >
      > > >Yahoo! Groups Links
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >No virus found in this incoming message.
      > > >Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
      > > >Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.12.1/2069 - Release Date: 04/20/09
      > > >10:36:00
      > >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >------------------------------------
      >
      >Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      >
      >
      >No virus found in this incoming message.
      >Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
      >Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.12.2/2074 - Release Date: 04/22/09
      >08:49:00
    • jefferstars@verizon.net
      Terry, The waterboarding review was sad. History was bloody. Have you focused a lot of your restoration knowledge on naval/military issues? Marci
      Message 2 of 5 , Apr 24, 2009
      • 0 Attachment
        Terry,
        The waterboarding review was sad. History was bloody.
        Have you focused a lot of your restoration knowledge on naval/military issues?
        Marci

        --- In pepysdiary@yahoogroups.com, Terry Foreman <terry.foreman@...> wrote:
        >
        > I keep learning Restoration stuff I was not taught in school. E.g., search
        > the annotations for "waterboarding."
        > Cheers,
        > Terry
        >
        > At 12:35 PM 4/22/2009 +0000, you wrote:
        > >Terry,
        > >Yes, thank you so much, now it makes perfect sense! Just when I think I've
        > >learned a lot...well, now I feel silly!
        > >Sincerely,
        > >Marci
        > >
        > >--- In pepysdiary@yahoogroups.com, Terry Foreman <terry.foreman@> wrote:
        > > >
        > > > MJ,
        > > >
        > > > Hope this helps:
        > > >
        > > > http://www.pepysdiary.com/about/faq/
        > > >
        > > > Terry Foreman
        > > >
        > > > At 11:49 PM 4/20/2009 +0000, you wrote:
        > > > >Hello all,
        > > > >I'm brand new to this group, but an old restoration history fan. Could
        > > you
        > > > >knowledgeable folks help me out with an idea I had? While on the Pepy's
        > > > >Diary site I was reading the entry from 8 February 1662/63 and I
        > > noticed a
        > > > >reference to the "little Duke of Monmouth."
        > > > >Am I correct in thinking that this title was not created for James Crofts
        > > > >until 1663, shortly after his arrival to England?
        > > > >I am very interested in the true year this entry was made. Does anyone
        > > > >else have theories or opinions as to whether it was 62 or 63?
        > > > >Thanks,
        > > > >MJ
        > > > >
        > > > >
        > > > >
        > > > >
        > > > >------------------------------------
        > > > >
        > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links
        > > > >
        > > > >
        > > > >
        > > > >No virus found in this incoming message.
        > > > >Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
        > > > >Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.12.1/2069 - Release Date: 04/20/09
        > > > >10:36:00
        > > >
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > >------------------------------------
        > >
        > >Yahoo! Groups Links
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > >No virus found in this incoming message.
        > >Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
        > >Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.12.2/2074 - Release Date: 04/22/09
        > >08:49:00
        >
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.