Re: [pcgen_developers] Getting Started Again
- On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 03:19:52PM -0600, Eric Jarman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Andrew Wilson <andrew@...> wrote:Thanks, I see it's actually older than JEP and started life as a maths
>> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 11:01:59AM -0800, Tom Parker wrote:
>>> In addition to your list, I'd be interested to know as well if Andrew
>>> (nuance) has looked further into the formula compiler discussion from
>>> a few months ago.
>> To be honest I haven't looked at it at all. Work got insanely busy for
>> 4 to 5 months and I haven't done anything. Things have quietened down
>> again and I should be able to start looking at that stuff. I do intend
>> to work on it during the transition to 6.0, but I'm aware that's it's
>> not pencilled in as a project priority.
> Just chiming in with a little research, as alternatives to JEP are few
> and far between. I found one that is still (sortof) active: JMEP
parser written in C.
> Other option would be to write our own in JavaCC or ANTLR. (Daunting,Tom wrote a formula parser in java a couple of years ago. Our current
> to say the least.)
intent is to base what we do on that. Tom checked it in ... about four
monts ago (yikes!). I was supposed to look it over, but then work got
mental and I haven't looked at it.
It may be daunting, but Tom reckons that it's already working, it just
needs integrated into out datat loading. Eventually we hope to have the
formula fully parsed on loading, so we can catch errors and deprecate
stuff properly. If we get it working we can bin both JEP and the old
PCGen maths parser.
Gemini: (May 21 - June 21)
This is the last chance to renew your subscription to Gemini. Act now to
ensure uninterrupted access to this valuable business, entertainment,
and predicting tool.
- Hi everyone, sorry I took so long to reply. Currently I'm snowed under
at home and work so my contribution to the LST editor is going to have
to go on hold. I can still do 4 or 5 hours a week so am available for
small updates/fixes, particularily on the gui side. Sorry to leave you
guys in the lurch on the bigger project.
James Dempsey wrote:
> I trust everyone had a refreshing break over Christmas/New Year - as I
> found myself it can be a great time to recharge! On the code front it
> has been rather quiet over the past month or so and it is now time to
> get our efforts for 6.0 back up and running.
> One way in which this is easier is that there will no longer be any
> coding done in the 5.16 branch, so we are fine to do larger scale
> changes in the trunk without fear of compatibility issues arising.
> There are 5 major projects we have planned for 6.0. These are
> * CDOM
> * UI Revamp (including CDOM UI and the designers review of the UI)
> * LST editor
> * Bonus system revamp
> * Output token revamp
> If you have been or are involved in these could you post back with your
> status in the next week or so. Also if you are just keen to get
> involved, please post too.
> What I am really interested in is your intent to participate and what
> time you would see yourself having to dedicate to it in the next couple
> of months. From that we will know which projects are active and which
> need new people to be involved.
> James Dempsey
> PCGen Code SB
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2659 - Release Date: 01/31/10 06:39:00