Re: [pcgen] [BUG] [Trackered] Missing DEFINE for Loremaster?
- View SourceBTW: SecertLore VAR is used for 2 different abilities - qualifying for
the Secerts and the Lore ability (basically, Bardic Knowledge with a
new name and no stacking). I'm wondering if that should be broken out
separately.. If we do that, it should be in Trunk for the next cycle,
PCGen LST Chimp
- View SourceOn Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Eddy Anthony <eddyba@...> wrote:
> Tir Gwaith scribed:No, that ability is granted at level 2, and shouldn't be at level 1.
>>>> I'm not sure if this is the ideal solution, but adding
>>>> 'DEFINE:SecretLore|0' to the first level line for Loremaster in
>>>> 'rsrd_classes_prestige.lst' corrected the issue, so I presume it was
>>>> just missed in coding.
>>> Thanks for the heads up! Tested in 5.16.0 RC1 and, yeah, no qualifications,
>>> even with a 20 INT.
>>> Trackered at:
>> Missed the tracker, so I didn't include it on the commit comments.
>> Fixed in R.9818, both in Trunk and 5.16 branch.
>> Now to go close the tracker. :)
> Um, the DEFINE isn't missing, it exists in the Secret Lore ability. The bug
> is that that ability is only granted at level 2, it needs to be granted at
> level 1.
The Bug is in that the DEFINE was moved to the Ability, since the same
VAR is used for 2 different features of the Loremaster: the Secrets
(every odd level) and the Lore ability on level 2.
PCGen LST Chimp
- View SourceQuoting Tir Gwaith (Tir.Gwaith@...):
> BTW: SecertLore VAR is used for 2 different abilities - qualifying forI think it should be broken into two variables. I think I remember a class
> the Secerts and the Lore ability (basically, Bardic Knowledge with a
> new name and no stacking). I'm wondering if that should be broken out
> separately.. If we do that, it should be in Trunk for the next cycle,
that gains only one of those two things.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]