Thanks for the response. I admit that support for new and exciting systems is a priority
(I'm looking forward to Pathfinder support myself), particularly in the face of limited time.
I might argue that a more developed lst editor would be part of a UI overhaul, but that's
I look forward to future developments.
--- In email@example.com, "Tom Parker" <thpr@...> wrote:
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Artus Faucon" <faucon@> wrote:
> > Is there any plan on adding more support, or features to make the
> lst editor easier to use for
> > inexperienced users?
> The simple answer is: Absolutely. I think we recognize that this is a
> critical feature, especially considering that we will not be able to
> ship data for 4E.
> The practical answer is: We only have so many developers. In fact, we
> have a handful of active developers at the moment, and we're forced to
> pick our battles. Our primary focus on 5.16 is getting in support for
> Pathfinder and 4E, the focus of one of the developers being some
> significant UI work. Beyond that, I think the next priority would be
> an LST editor.
> As to when it will happen? It might happen in 5.16 if we make a lot
> of progress. It may not. I'm not in the business of speculating what
> our plans are beyond 5.16, so I will leave it at: We recognize it's
> important, and are doing our best.