Re: [pcgen] Re: Next Set request cycle open....
- On Friday 30 May 2008 11:16:28 Martijn Verburg wrote:
> We'll be discussing this at the next BoD meeting as well, but inI'll put in proposals or freqs for needed code stuff as far as I see later
> principle we'd like to see Pathfinder go in for 5.16! So are you able
> to Tracker and/or send me a list of items to Tracker for anything
> that's Pathfinder related? I'd like to get it on the official roadmap :).
The feat progression thing I mentioned in my earlier post I have already
working here. :)
Happiness is the Road
- Hi Kar,
I saw the wiki wishlist... If we have a tracker request list then we
need to categorize it as "Requesting" or some way to recognize it's not
being actively pursued or going through the QC/OGL/DATA review process.
You'll also note, I had Mongoose Quintessential Series listed as
Wishlist (Which I did grab from the wish list). But as a courtesy, I
figured I'd ask for any fresh requests as some of those are old requests
(3+ years old) and may not have any existing users currently needing
them. (I'd like to make a set that at least ONE user has a current
desire or need for at this time)
~ Andrew Maitland (LegacyKing)
~ Admin Silverback, PCGen Board of Directors
~ Data Gibbon, Tracker Gibbon, Docs Lemur
"Quick-Silverback Tracker Monkey"
Martijn Verburg wrote:
> Hey Andrew,[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> There's also the list that sits on our Wiki and a list that sits on
> the trackers (in terms of what people have requested in the past).
>> Okay folks,
>> I've finished working on the Quintessential Ranger and Quintessential
>> Ranger II. I'm still taking requests at this time if anyone has
>> pressing they'd like to see included in PCGen or need for a game.
>> The following restrictions apply:
>> * Paizo is already being worked on. I won't work on something
>> already being done by another lst monkey.
>> * I can't do any closed content. [Please don't ask.]
>> * Whatever set I work on will be intended to be part of the PCGen
>> program. [Permissions are found on the WIKI].
>> * Obviously I need a copy, if I don't one would need to be provided.
>> This is on my list of to do's (kinda in whim order):
>> 1. Personally Requested set(s) - limit 2 please
>> 2. Magic of Arcanis (Complete the Arcanis series)
>> 3. Assisting in the clean up of Player's Guide to Arcanis
>> 4. PCGen compatibility with CMP (limited to sets I've made at
> this time)
>> 5. Wish list items - Mongoose Quintessential Series.
>> Okay, I kind of work on a first come first serve basis. So get your
>> responses in quickly (And yes fellow simians may make requests).
>> General time line - 3.5 sets are easier than 3e; complicated source
>> books with really funky rules will take longer than a simple expansion
>> book. I average approx 1-2 week(s) depending on complications and size
>> of book.
>> What you get is a PCGen standard set (Following all relevant rules on
>> data set submission) that will be compatible with the latest version of
>> PCGen (5.14) and will be brought in the PCGen (5.15) series after it
>> completes it's rigorous QC and review. I will send you a pre-release
>> copy after I feel it is ready for general use (same copy I submit to
>> PCGen submission team).
>> This will likely be the last time I ask for requests for several
>> Busy schedule coming up...
>> ~ Andrew Maitland (LegacyKing)
>> ~ Admin Silverback, PCGen Board of Directors
>> ~ Data Gibbon, Tracker Gibbon, Docs Lemur
>> "Quick-Silverback Tracker Monkey"
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> PCGen's Release site: http://pcgen.sourceforge.net
> PCGen's Wiki: http://pcgen.wiki.sourceforge.net/
> PCGen's Roadmap: http://pcgen.wiki.sourceforge.net/Roadmap
> PCGen's Alpha Build: http://pcgen.sourceforge.net/07_autobuilds.php
> PCGen's Online Docs: http://pcgen.sourceforge.net/autobuilds/pcgen-docs/
> PCGen's Data Help Grp: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PCGenListFileHelp/Yahoo! Groups Links
> Hi Kar,Yeah, when I re-grouped all of those trackers there were several that
> I saw the wiki wishlist... If we have a tracker request list then we
> need to categorize it as "Requesting" or some way to recognize it's
> not being actively pursued or going through the QC/OGL/DATA review
hadn't even been worked on, I think I'd like to see those simply
shifted back to the wishlist, I'll nudge Eddy in the BoD and see what