Re: Build environment
- View SourceHi Sam,
> I was going to get familiar with the code base before joining.That's totally fine! Don't mind my overzealous attempt at recruiting,
it's part of the job description for all BoD members ;)
> I have a group of players that I had started with 5.12.1, and theyThat's what we like to hear! All I can state is that we've got
> were having problems using PCGen. Some of them tried other (not to
> be named) software(s) which also are giving them problems, although
> often different ones. I still think PCGen's about the best of the
> bunch, so I thought that rather than add yet another member to the
> genre I should work on the best of category to make it better
offically 79 volunteers working on the project and according the the
Y! numbers several thousand users, so we like to think we're pretty
active about treying to improve things :)
> (or provide a different front end for my users if a simple player'sIf you're interested in the the new UI effort, don't hesitate to
> manager is what's really needed). As I've been researching, the
> level of support for PCGen is such that I'm even more convinced
> that this is the most correct course for me to follow.
contact 'Connor' on the developers mailing list, he's heading up that
> >* I assume you meant SVN as opposed to CVS? Our code base now liesNope, not a bad idea, something we need to tidy up on our side, it's
> > in the SVN repository.
> Actually, no I really did mean CVS. As noted upthread since CVS
> came first in the list I assumed (yeah, I know that's a bad idea)
> that it would be a valid place to start.
good you discovered this!
> >Also please look through the documentation and guides on our wikiIf the wiki information isn't clear or is missing steps etc then
> >. at:
> >In particular you'll want to follow the link to the Code team which
> >should contain all of the information you need to get up and
> >running (if not please let us know!)
> I had been there, and am still a bit confused, but that may just
> mean that I don't have the correct source. I'll jump in on this
> later tonight when I get home from work. I also noted the IRC
> channel mentioned upthread, and will add it to my list of IRC
> channels to look in on.
please do let us know as we'll need to improve that ASAP. It's been
awhile since a new developer tried to follow those steps unaided as it
Oh and welcome to the community!
- View Source
so Frank and I can get to it? Or at least stash a copy somewhere so I can
at least look at it even if I can't edit it?
I'm on satellite (as is Frank, IIRC) and the high-latency is apparently a
problem for the wiki part of SF as I always time out and can't get to the
wiki at all.
- View SourceHi all,
> > http://pcgen.wiki.sourceforge.net/Yeah I'd hoped that the server upgrade to the SF site would improve
> Been meaning to ask this for a long time... can we move this somewhere
> else so Frank and I can get to it? Or at least stash a copy somewhere
> so I can at least look at it even if I can't edit it?
> I'm on satellite (as is Frank, IIRC) and the high-latency is
> apparently a problem for the wiki part of SF as I always time out and
> can't get to the wiki at all.
things (the rest of the site is much snappier), but the wiki is still
no good for satellite users.
I'm honestly not sure what to do about it at this stage. We have got
a test media wiki install on our new website testing ground, but I'm a
bit hesitant to port our entire wiki across to that (as it's not a
I dug around the admin options for the wiki and luckily I can export
it as HTML! So I've uploaded here to the Y! boards and will do so
anytime someone requests it :).
- View Source
> -----Original Message-----Not optimal for anyone, but at least I can see the roadmap that way.
> I dug around the admin options for the wiki and luckily I can export
> it as HTML! So I've uploaded here to the Y! boards and will do so
> anytime someone requests it :).
- View SourceHi all,
The link to the CVS repository on the SF site has now been removed.
The repository still remains behind the scenes, but people won't
accidentally stumble upon it now :)
PS: I'd just like to say that it's users pointing out even little
things like this that help improve the project, so don't be scared to
> Hmm, that's a good point, although we have docs on the wiki etc to
> guide developers towards SVN etc, anyone who dives straight in (like
> Sam) will still see what looks like a valid code base in CVS.
> I'll post to the dev list and see if we can archive that CVS off
> somewhere and then get it removed/emptied from the SF site.
> Thanks for the heads up!