Re: [pcgen] Re: [Trackered] Fast Movement and TYPE
[ 1786075 ] [RSRD] Monk Fast Movement needs Enhancement TYPE
More inline -
Tir Gwaith wrote:
> On 8/31/07, Andrew Maitland <drew0500@...> wrote:No, that was the gist... We also defined low-hanging fruit as
>> Yes, we had an email discussion about leaving low-hanging fruit.
>> Something where you didn't need to back track multi-lateral dependencies
>> or such...
> That was a side discussion, IIRC. Low hanging fruit was that I was
> grabbing and doing the really easy bugs, and all the remaining were
> complex, making it difficult for other monkeys to get experience. Was
> I totally out of it during the exchange?
non-multi-level dependencies - like NOT the Mace... LOL
>Oh ok... Have we opened a tracker on this? (Sheesh, go to sleep for a
>> Oh, I opened your tracker for new stuff since 5.12, BUT, I don't see any
>> tracker with a request to swap TYPE=Enhancement to TYPE=ENHANCEMENT or
>> such... (Am I going crazy?)
> There isn't. I was just mentioning so when you implement the Monk
> Movement with TYPE=Enhancement, not TYPE=ENHANCEMENT. :P
few hours and it seems like I miss half the conversation) - nope no new
trackers. I'm "assuming" that you want a tracker and then I'll handle
it... Yes, I think that's what I'm missing. [Andrew M's worst times,
apparently, to hold conversations before and after sleep] - Yes,
Enhancement isn't hardcoded.
>Micky D? Yum.
>> Andrew (M) can be either of us, but since I figure you're off the good
>> drugs, you aren't talking to yourself.
> I'm Tir, or Andrew McD. Not even close to Andrew M. No resemblance.
> I have no idea where you would get such an idea.
Okay off to open a tracker and do some fixing...
Tracker & Data Tamarin, Docs Lemur
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]