Re: [pcgen] Re: Spell Use Cases Part II (was: Wizard Prepared Spellbooks)
- On 6/14/05, taluroniscandar <mhgj@...> wrote:
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Truth <geeknz@g...> wrote:Technically yes, they're spell-like abilities. However they follow the
> > On 6/10/05, Brass Tilde <brasstilde@g...> wrote:
> > > A Spellcaster is limited in the number of spells of he can cast in
> a day.
> > While true for the RSRD, it's not completely true for all source books.
> > E.g. Warlock from Complete Arcane. They have a very limited list of
> > Known "Spells", but can cast them at will as often as wanted.
> > While we're not allowed to code this class specifically, we should
> > allow for the capability of similar caster style classes.
> The warlock uses spell-like abilities not spells. The SPELLS tag
> supports unlimited uses per day. And there was some talk a couple of
> months ago about improving the x per y where you could do 1/week
> 2/fortnight, etc. Don't know where that's at (or if it even got a
rules for spells with simple somantic components. DC's etc. are
calculated like they were spells, etc. It'd be a lot easier to just
code them as spells.
Otherwise you'd have to load them with something like feats. And the
chooser would be, well annoying. Especially if you decided you wanted
to go back and change your choice later.
> And an unset number of spells per day is already supported by pcgen.Cool.
> Put in KNOWN tags but leave off the CAST. That's how the psionics are
Was mostly just mentioning this to include the option in the list
Brass was generating.
There is no religion higher than the Truth.