Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

[FREQ] Re: Equipping tab

Expand Messages
  • Sigurdur H. Olafsson
    A little on user friendlyness here. Would it be possible to make Name the default for Sort Equipment on the Equipping? (Instead of Type) I think it is the
    Message 1 of 35 , Jan 1, 2004
    • 0 Attachment
      A little on user friendlyness here.
      Would it be possible to make Name the default for "Sort Equipment" on
      the Equipping? (Instead of Type)

      I think it is the view that makes the most sense for this tab, it
      gives you the best overview of the stuff you have already purchased
      under the Gear tab.

      --- In pcgen@yahoogroups.com, "merton_monk" <merton_monk@y...> wrote:
      > --- In pcgen@yahoogroups.com, "Jayme Cox" <jayme@r...> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > IMO, this could be done simply just as Jayme says
      > > > without changing the nature of Equipment objects at all.
      > >
      > > Ross is correct, it wasn't hard to do after all. Code CVS'ed for
      > next autobuild.
      >
      > Cool - so people can grab the alpha and have a look to see if they
      > have any feedback. Thanks for the fast work, Jayme! :)
      >
      > -Bryan
      >
      > >
      > > --Jayme
    • Sigurdur H. Olafsson
      A little on user friendlyness here. Would it be possible to make Name the default for Sort Equipment on the Equipping? (Instead of Type) I think it is the
      Message 35 of 35 , Jan 1, 2004
      • 0 Attachment
        A little on user friendlyness here.
        Would it be possible to make Name the default for "Sort Equipment" on
        the Equipping? (Instead of Type)

        I think it is the view that makes the most sense for this tab, it
        gives you the best overview of the stuff you have already purchased
        under the Gear tab.

        --- In pcgen@yahoogroups.com, "merton_monk" <merton_monk@y...> wrote:
        > --- In pcgen@yahoogroups.com, "Jayme Cox" <jayme@r...> wrote:
        > > >
        > > > IMO, this could be done simply just as Jayme says
        > > > without changing the nature of Equipment objects at all.
        > >
        > > Ross is correct, it wasn't hard to do after all. Code CVS'ed for
        > next autobuild.
        >
        > Cool - so people can grab the alpha and have a look to see if they
        > have any feedback. Thanks for the fast work, Jayme! :)
        >
        > -Bryan
        >
        > >
        > > --Jayme
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.