Re: [BoD Report]
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Steven Gilroy <sgilroy2@w...> wrote:
> My biggest concern with this is that this is where people areseeing
> that grey line between PCGen and CMP.for a fee.
> We (PCGen) are not distributing something OGL that we could be
> distributing for free and CMP is distributing that same content
> Let me re-iterate the fact that I know that CMP and PCGen arecompletely
> seperate entities...but this is one of the areas that make somepeople
> doubt that.So what do you propose? That PCGen include something against the
publishers wishes? It has been standard policy in PCGen for a long
time - far in advance of any inkling of forming CMP - to respect the
publisher's wishes. As Ian states in another post on this thread,
if we don't respect a publisher's wishes, they'll be less likely to
give us permission for other items that *do* require permission
(i.e. closed content). So being courteous is not only the
respectful thing to do, it's also the most beneficial course in the
- On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 02:48:13PM -0500, Charbeneau, Chuck wrote:
>I dunno. It sounds like you've got a dihydrogen monoxide
> I can stop drinking (alcohol, Caffeine, whatever...) anytime I want.
(http://www.dhmo.org) dependency; that could be a challenge.
Keith Davies "Your ability to bang your head against
keith.davies@... reality in the hope that reality will
crack first is impressive, but futile"
-- Geoffrey Brent, rec.games.frp.dnd