Re: Quickie question for the FAQ (Mac-specific)
- I know, this confused me as well. Basically I got asked by Mynex (I
suspect being the only person awake @ 3.00am EST helped <grin>) to
get a FAQ written up (based off Peder's one + lots from Yahoo groups
& a splash of humor) for the production release, it was a bit of an
emergency, hence, probably the lack of communication with you and
Peder ;-(. I certainly on't want to undermine your efforts!
I'm totally cool with merging our FAQs.
It is probably best if we wait until Mynex has finished with the
production FAQ (he needs to tweak it a litle) and then we can merge
the 2 and host it in one place?
We'll continue this offline
--- In pcgen@y..., "karianna03" <martijnv@d...> wrote:
> I wrote a quick FAQ (based off Peder's one) for the production
> release, I think the answer I have in there will help? I'll put it
> into the files section for you in the the FAQ directory
> --- In pcgen@y..., "m00man" <brian_bloom@y...> wrote:
> > --- In pcgen@y..., Scott Ellsworth <scott@a...> wrote:
> > > > Can someone Mac-savvy give me some verbiage describing the
> > way
> > > > to tell is Java is installed?
> > >
> > > Java is installed by default on MacOS X. Thus, every MacOS X
> user has
> > > it already. Suggest strongly that they should be using MacOS X
> 10.1 or
> > > later, as that has a better Java 1.3.1 implementation.
> > >
> > So to clarify (so I'm not saying the wrong thing in the FAQ), OS X
> > *prior to 10.1* had a "worse version" of 1.3.1? Or had an older
> > version of Java prior to 1.3.1? In other words, would *all* OS X
> > users get "1.3.1" when they do 'java -version'? Or just those
> > 10.1 or newer?
> > Thanks again!
> > (I haven't used a Mac since 1992 - a wee bit before Java came
> > mooman