Re: AC modifier question
- View Source--- In pcgen@y..., "mark_hulsman" <hulsmanm@p...> wrote:
> > Actually, I think if you give a negative bonus a TYPE it will bethe reason why I think that COMBAT|AC|-1|TYPE=enhancment
> > ignored. BONUS:COMBAT|AC|-1 by itself should work. But there's
> > already a Rage template in place, so hopefully that will do the
> It shouldn't be too hard to change the code to compare to negative
> maxInt instead of zero, that way it would find the highest bonus of
> that type including negatives and use it.
didn't work is because it -is- not stacked, so it was probably taking
the best value... obviously, 0 is better than -1. :)
I think that's why removing the Type would make it work again...
at least, that's how the non-stacking rules would work, and giving it
a TYPE= puts it into that nonstack type.