Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

New looping construct

Expand Messages
  • STILES, BRAD
    ... Why not simply call it LOOP in the first place. I understand why a programmer thought to use FOR in the first place, but most non-programmers aren t going
    Message 1 of 1 , Nov 1, 2001
    • 0 Attachment
      >
      > What you suggest makes a lot of sense. Can you leave the current way
      > FOR and DFOR loops work so we don't break existing character sheets?
      > Not a requirement, but it would be nice. Maybe have your new nested
      > loops called NFOR.

      Why not simply call it LOOP in the first place. I understand why a
      programmer thought to use FOR in the first place, but most non-programmers
      aren't going to care much about that.

      |LOOP.variable.min.max.step|
      ITEM.%variable
      |ENDLOOP|
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.