Re: Spellbooks -- pages?
- I like the idea of tracking where the spell came from. Generally,
the list files should contain as much information as possible so new
features are easy to implement. The coders can choose to ignore that
feature of the list for months before choosing to add it. I think it
would be cool if you could control how those rules are applied from
your campaign file but that is far down the line.
--- In pcgen-xml@y..., Keith Davies <kjdavies@t...> wrote:
> Hi All,
> I'm working on how to do spellbooks, and there are a couple of
> I can go.
> 1. Just list the spells in the order they appear. Quick, simple,
> 2. List the spells in the order they appear, including an
> what spell list they came from. This could mean more work.
> When learning a new spell from a spellbook, it doesn't matter what
> class the spell was learned from, as long as it is available to the
> class the character is learning the spell as (for instance, a wizard
> could learn a spell from an assassin's book if it is a spell that a
> wizard could cast anyway).
> The only *measurable* thing this could affect under core rules is
> number of pages of the book assigned to a spell -- a spell written
> an assassin may take more pages than the same spell written as a
> wizard... even if it's the same character. Weird, but there you go.
> Anyway, if we track the pages we can make a 'spellbook creator' that
> will limit the number of spells that may be present in a book of a
> particular number of pages. Or, we could simply forget it and just
> keep track of what spells, and leave it at that.
> That's for the core rules. However, I can easily see a campaign
> is more strict about the spell lists and doesn't allow learning of
> spells from another spell list, *even if* it appears on the list of
> the class trying to learn the spell. For instance, if assassin and
> wizard both have /knock/, the wizard would be unable to
> from the assassin's spellbook, even though /knock/ is on the
> spell list. In this case, tracking what spell list the spell
> on is useful.
> I plan to do this so that the spell list the spell was recorded from
> is identified (the second choice). It'll add some more work, but I
> think the benefits down the road will be worth it.
> Questions or comments?
> Keith Davies
> Logan: "I don't think it's a good idea."
> Raven: "The vote is three to one against you -- me, the crystal
> and the little voices in your head."