16905Re: [patriotzip] Re: Welker Injured
- Jan 5, 2010I figured they put Hoyer in to get him some seasoning in case he is needed to play. He did a good job and might have had a better chance at the win so I'm not sure why he wasn't left in. I think he was brought in at the end because of Brady's poor decision on the interception. Brady has looked too much like Drew Bledsoe this year for my liking. I sure wish he could back to the decision-making that made him practically unbeatable all the time rather than just some of the time. He does look so good at times but at other times not so much.
At 08:35 AM 1/4/2010 -0500, you wrote:
The choice in how and when to play Brady certainly seems strange to me as well. If it was purely more time with
Eddleman and others than why was he removed in the second when Wes was already injured and that time would have been
valuable too? Maybe they re-evaluated at half time but hard to say.
If they were just protecting Brady from unnecessary hits with the late pull than why the three passes on the drive
before that when we had a lead. We really did do some head scratching things in this game though I don't think the
fact Welker was playing was a coaching blunder. I am, however, with Mark in being frustrated that if we play our
starters I want to get better results and it seemed we didn't set them up for the better results that get you to the
playoffs peaking. If you aren't going to set them up for those best results than I start to wonder why we play them so
- << Previous post in topic