Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
Attention: Starting December 14, 2019 Yahoo Groups will no longer host user created content on its sites. New content can no longer be uploaded after October 28, 2019. Sending/Receiving email functionality is not going away, you can continue to communicate via any email client with your group members. Learn More

52702Re: Is Eternal Recurrence a valid concept at all?

Expand Messages
  • xplusx@tuta.io
    Aug 22
      Hallo Daniel. Interesting answer, and I think our conclusions basically agree. Jill ("my other half") had been wondering whether, if ER was literally true, it might explain the deja vu phenomenon and that's how we got to talking about it. Even though I see it as only having a "stimulus value" and, unlike the will to power, no actual value as part of a description of the universe, I have still given it some thought since it was so important in N's eyes. Walter Kaufmann wrote in Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist that most of N's interpreters have disregarded the conception of ER though it would seem no author can be understood correctly as long as the very notion which he himself valued most extravagantly is ignored. Which reminds me I'm overdue a rereading of Kaufmann's great book, where ER gets quite a bit of discussion.
    • Show all 6 messages in this topic