Coulter: Media Muslim makeovers!
Media Muslim makeovers!
by Ann Coulter
After all the speculation about the sniper terrorizing Maryland and
Virginia, at last we have some cold hard facts. He is a Muslim. He
converted to Islam 17 years ago. He changed his name to John Muhammad. He
belonged to Louis Farrakhan's Nation of Islam. He cheered the terrorist
attack of Sept. 11. He registered his getaway vehicle with the DMV on the
anniversary of Sept. 11 -- writing down the time of registration as 8:52
Naturally, therefore, the mainstream media have decided the crucial,
salient fact about sniper John Muhammad is that he is a Gulf War veteran.
Thus, The New York times described the snipers as: "John Allen Muhammad,
41, a Gulf War veteran, and John Lee Malvo, 17, a Jamaican."
They are now hot on the trail of whether Osama bin Laden ever served with
the U.S. military in the Gulf War.
To review recent events, last year, 19 Muslims slaughtered thousands of
Americans on U.S. soil. Since then, one Muslim tried to blow up a U.S.
commercial jet with a shoe bomb and another Muslim shot up Los Angeles
airport. The Religion of Peace has also been active abroad, decapitating
an American journalist and blowing up a French tanker. In the last few
weeks alone, Muslims bombed a nightclub in Bali and were narrowly
prevented from slaughtering hundreds of theater-goers in Moscow.
Inasmuch as the nation is at war with Islamic terrorists, you might think
it would be of passing interest that the sniper is a Muslim. But you need
a New York Times decoder ring to figure out that GULF WAR VETERAN John
Muhammad is a Muslim. The main clue is the Times' repeated insistence that
Islam had absolutely nothing to do with the shootings.
Wrestling with the freakish development that a practitioner of the
Religion of Peace is a killer, the Times has even rushed to print with the
completely unsubstantiated speculation that John Muhammad had recently
rejected Islam. Experts explained that a "rapid and bizarre change in
religious beliefs" is common among "serial killers." One doctor said a
change in religious beliefs before committing violent crimes is "a fairly
well-known phenomenon in clinical psychiatry," adding that he "was not
diagnosing Mr. Muhammad's condition."
His condition? He's a Muslim. That's his condition and his diagnosis. It
may be time to update the DSM-IV by adding "Jihad Impulse-Control
Disorder" to its index of official diagnoses.
In addition to copious articles intimating that John Muhammad was
practically not even a Muslim, the media have universally concluded that
there is "no evidence" connecting him to al-Qaida. Of course, it will be
difficult to find any evidence, having instantly pronounced the case
In one hard-hitting investigative piece on Muhammad, for example, the
Times produced amazing details from his life, including conversations with
relatives, neighbors, friends and ex-girlfriends. The article droned on
about how he met one ex-girlfriend -- her job, her hobbies, her hopes and
dreams. But when she said, "We stopped talking after he asked me about
religion," the Times dropped the subject and moved on to the next topic.
After weeks of blithe theorizing that the sniper was an "angry white male"
-- based on invidious and offensive stereotypes -- aren't we entitled to a
little theorizing about Muhammad's terrorist ties? There is surely more
evidence that he was a member of al-Qaida than that he abandoned Islam
before carrying out the sniper attacks.
Emerging as al-Qaida's leading spokesman in America, the Times has also
blacked out the information that the terrorists who seized a Moscow
theater last week were practitioners of the Religion of Peace.
I note again: America is at war with Islamic fanatics. But in a prolix
front-page article about the "hostage siege" in Russia, the Times referred
to the Islamic fanatics who stormed the theater exclusively as the
"captors," the "separatists" and the "guerrillas." One searches in vain
for a clear statement that the Moscow hostage crisis was yet another
enterprise of the Religion of Peace.
The only hint that the "captors" were even Muslims was the Times'
dismissive description of Russian President Vladimir Putin's reaction to
the terrorists' demands. Instead of acquiescing, Putin "cho(se) to cast
the rebels as international Islamic terrorists." The Times knows a cheap
political ploy when it sees one.
In one of the oddest attempts to soften depictions of Islam -- the one
religion the media respects -- the Times has apparently banned the word
"burka" from its pages. (Burkas have gotten such a bad name recently!)
Instead, one reads only about the "burka-style gowns" of the Islamic
terrorists in Moscow or the "burka-like robes" of women in Bahrain. (How
about: The swastika-like adornment on the skinhead's forearm.)
Not to be outdone by the Times, CNN has valiantly insisted on calling John
Muhammad by his Christian name. The night the snipers' names were first
released, CNN's Jeanne Meserve repeatedly called Muhammad two names he
does not answer to: "Here are the names. John Allen Williams, aka Muhammad
Williams, and also a John Lee Malvo." Williams isn't his name. It's not
even "Muhammad Williams." It is John Allen Muhammad.
After assuring viewers "we will deal with this carefully," Aaron Brown
summed up Meserve's report, saying, "We will say again that these two men,
John Allen Williams and John Malvo -- and I'm not clear on the spelling on
Malvo ..." While telling whoppers about Muhammad's name, he's fretting
about spelling issues.
The next night Brown slipped and mistakenly called Muhammad by his actual
name. He was quickly corrected by Kelli Arena:
BROWN: "And then it was sometime later that they got the second name,
Muhammad or Williams, I guess."
ARENA: "Right, Williams."
Perhaps CNN should go whole hog and start describing Muhammad as a member
of the "religious right" whose name is "Jerry Falwell."
2002 Universal Press Syndicate
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use
has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The
'johnmacsgroup' Internet discussion group is is making it available
without profit to group members who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the
understanding of literary, educational, political, and economic issues,
for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I believe that this
constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in
section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted
material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must
obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
"When you come to the fork in the road, take it" - L.P. Berra
"Always make new mistakes" -- Esther Dyson
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic"
-- Arthur C. Clarke
John F. McMullen
ICQ: 4368412 AIM & Yahoo Messenger: johnmac13