Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.


Expand Messages
  • Beowulf
    http://www.newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff374.htm SOCIALISTS DEMAND TRILLIONS IN CLIMATE DEBT By Cliff Kincaid December 8, 2009 NewsWithViews.com You don t
    Message 1 of 1 , Dec 8, 2009
    • 0 Attachment


      By Cliff Kincaid
      December 8, 2009

      You don't need to attend the United Nations climate change conference to
      know what's really going on.

      Ignoring the fallacies behind the "science" of man-made global warming, a
      new U.N. report on "climate justice" says the U.S. and other countries owe
      $24 trillion in "climate debt" to the rest of the world. The report,
      "Climate Justice for a Changing Planet
      <http://www.un-ngls.org/spip.php?page=climatejustice> ," argues that the
      United States is "historically the largest global emitter" of greenhouse gas
      emissions and therefore has the biggest "debt" to pay.

      But another U.N. report puts the figure at $45 trillion.

      President Obama seems prepared to accept this bogus claim by attending the
      United Nations conference on December 18.

      The U.S. failure to pay, argues leftist Canadian writer Naomi Klein, has
      already produced "climate rage" and a "global movement for climate justice"
      led by Bolivia's socialist President Evo Morales. The implication is that if
      the U.S. doesn't pay up, protests and even violence could break out.

      In a statement, the Morales regime declared that "What we call for is full
      payment of the debt owed to us by developed countries for threatening the
      integrity of the Earth's climate system, for over-consuming a shared
      resource that belongs fairly and equally to all people, and for maintaining
      lifestyles that continue to threaten the lives and livelihoods of the poor
      majority of the planet's population."

      In other words, Americans are supposed to feel guilty over having a
      successful industrial economy. It is a system that has produced more wealth
      for more people than any in human history.

      A detailed proposal from Bolivia says "a wealthy minority," presumably in
      the U.S. and other "rich" nations, "has already over-consumed a considerable
      amount of environmental space," thus "denying it to the poorer majority who
      needs it in the course of their development."

      Naomi Klein describes the proposed payments as "reparations."

      But as startling as the figure of $24 trillion sounds, a separate report
      from the U.N. Environmental Program says the cost could be as high as $45
      trillion. It is estimated that "a package to address climate change and
      energy development needs at the global level may require US $45 trillion up
      to 2025," it says.

      The March 2009 "Global <http://www.unep.org/pdf/GGND_Final_Report.pdf>
      Green New Deal" report says that the global financial crisis is an
      opportunity to usher in a new international socialist order. "The rules of
      financial architecture and of global environmental governance are being
      simultaneously re-written in 2009," the report explains. "We believe that
      there is a unique historical opportunity now to create the basis of a new
      Green Economy that is able to allocate natural capital and financial capital
      in a far more effective and efficient manner into the foreseeable future. We
      must not miss this chance to fundamentally shift the trajectory of human

      The author of this report was Professor Edward
      <http://uwacadweb.uwyo.edu/barbier/> B. Barbier of the University of
      Wyoming. His "Global Green New Deal" report was prepared in consultation
      with the U.S. Presidential Climate Action Project, a little-known entity
      launched by the University of Colorado whose advisory board
      <http://www.climateactionproject.com/advisory.php> includes ousted White
      House communist "Green Jobs Czar" Van Jones. World Net Daily highlighted
      Jones' role in the group in a November 30 story
      <http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=117548> by Aaron Klein.

      Co-authored by Barbara Adams and Gretchen Luchsinger, the most recent United
      Nations report on "climate justice" says "because the world's richest
      countries have contributed most to the problem, they have a greater
      obligation to take action and to do so more quickly." Paying a "climate
      debt" is the way to make sure that "extreme imbalances in development are
      evened out."

      "China now produces the largest amount of overall national emissions,
      topping the United States," the report says. "But this figure must be
      qualified by the fact that China's population is four times as large as that
      of the United States, making its per capita emissions rate roughly 75
      percent less."

      Hence, the U.S. is still the chief culprit and should pay the most.

      The report was launched in conjunction with the U.N. climate change
      conference now taking place in Copenhagen and is designed for the
      consideration of policy makers and non-governmental organizations. It is
      being distributed by the United Nations Non-Governmental Liaison Service.

      "Given the escalating pace of global warming," the report argues, the world
      "now has to act with far greater urgency." But change is possible only with
      "major economic and political rearrangements around the core principles of
      equity and sustainable development."

      These are euphemisms for destroying private property rights and the free
      enterprise system and creating a global socialist superstate.

      Under a heading about the need to "transform the systems and institutions
      that have created climate change," the authors say that "tinkering around
      the edges" will not suffice and that "Governance and development models
      should be built around notions of justice and equity, with the objective of
      working for the planet and people as a whole, and evening out imbalances
      that are not sustainable. It is not enough to talk about low-carbon pathways
      through technology, for example, without also rethinking current models of
      production, global trade and consumption patterns."

      Proposals for "climate change financing" include a Comprehensive World
      Climate Change Fund, into which payments could be made, and a global carbon

      The ATTAC movement says
      <http://www.attac.org/en/tags/copenhagen-2009/change-system-not-climate> ,
      "Change the system, not the climate!" ATTAC, which stands for the
      Association for the Taxation of Financial Transactions for the Aid of
      Citizens, favors global taxes on currency transactions.

      A more detailed article on "climate justice" explains that "It isn't simply
      a matter of asking the rich world to pay for the devastation climate change
      is causing in the developing world. As a report recently
      <http://www.wdm.org.uk/climatedebtreport> launched by World Development
      Movement and Jubilee Debt Campaign points out, 'climate debt' questions a
      global free market system which has pushed many developing countries into
      high carbon pathways that they now need to find a way out of."

      This is about as clear as it gets-free markets will give way to a worldwide
      socialist state, created under the guise of solving a climate crisis that
      does not really exist.

      The authors, Nick Dearden and Tim Jones, attempt to throw cold water on Lord
      Christopher Monckton's contention that this amounts to a blueprint for
      "world communist government." However, they acknowledge that the proposal
      does imply "fundamental changes in the global economy" and the "radical
      redistribution of the world's resources."

      Do you think we can count on the major media attending the conference to
      report on the real agenda behind the event?

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.