Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Hamas is Muslim Brotherhood, Not Iran's Puppet

Expand Messages
  • Beowulf
    Hamas is Not Iran s Puppet New America Media, Commentary, William O. Beeman, Posted: Dec 31, 2008 Review it on NewsTrust
    Message 1 of 1 , Jan 1, 2009
    • 0 Attachment
      Hamas is Not Iran's Puppet

      New America Media, Commentary, William O. Beeman, Posted: Dec 31, 2008
      Review it on NewsTrust


      Editor's Note: The popular wisdom that Iran is pulling the strings behind
      Hamas doesn't take into account the geography of Gaza argues William O.
      Beeman. Beeman is professor and chair of the Department of Anthropology at
      the University of Minnesota and past-president of the Middle East Section of
      the American Anthropological Association. He is the author of "The 'Great
      Satan' vs. the 'Mad Mullahs': How the United States and Iran Demonize Each
      Other," published by the University of Chicago Press (2008).

      The conflict between Israel and Hamas is not a proxy war between Israel and
      Iran. This is a myth that has grown up during the Bush administration, and
      is now widely promulgated with little or no support.

      Iran has, it is true, been sympathetic to the Hamas situation, particularly
      since the U.S.-endorsed Palestinian elections of 2006, when Hamas won a
      plurality of votes, allowing it to form a government. Subsequently, the new
      Palestinian government was rejected by Israel and the United States, and an
      economic embargo plunged the Palestinians into economic chaos. At that point
      Iran provided substantial humanitarian aid.

      In the present conflict, Iran is also sending two ships to provide
      humanitarian assistance.

      However, American and Israeli analysts would have the world believe that
      Hamas could not carry out any actions against Israel if they were not
      directed by Iran. As George Joffee of the Cambridge Centre of International
      Studies maintained in 2006 in aninterview with
      <http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1065130.html> U.S.-based Radio Free
      Europe and Radio Liberty, "The Israeli government has alleged that
      indirectly through Hezbollah in Lebanon, Iran is engaged in trying to
      control the events inside the Occupied Territories and there have been
      allegations with no proof at all, of involvement in some of the more violent
      activities there. Those links I suspect are largely Israeli propaganda and
      don't really carry water."

      The same is true today.

      No one promulgating the theory that Hamas's attacks on Israel are directed
      by Iran bothers to think much about geography. Hamas has been effectively
      sealed off from the world by Israel, and by Egypt. The Israelis have
      essentially controlled the import of food and medical supplies. The idea of
      Iran shipping arms to Hamas under these conditions is patently absurd. The
      rockets launched against Israel that started the current conflict were
      clearly homemade, low-level weapons, not sophisticated arms.

      A parallel claim is that Iranians are providing training to Hamas. Given the
      rhetoric, one would imagine that this is being done on a massive scale.
      However, on March 9, 2008 the Times of
      <http://uk.reuters.com/article/middleeastCrisis/idUKLU87392> London reported
      that 150 Hamas fighters were being trained in Tehran. Hamas itself claims to
      have 15,000 fighters, and Israel has millions of potential fighters at its
      command. Thus training for a team of 150, if the facts are correct, is
      hardly much of a threat to Israel.

      Hezbollah in Lebanon is sometimes cited as an Iranian cat's-paw in the
      region, but Hezbollah has no geographical access to Gaza. Therefore they are
      limited to leading protests in Lebanon. Timur Goksel, former adviser to U.N.
      Peacekeepers in Lebanon, told Reuters News
      <http://uk.reuters.com/article/middleeastCrisis/idUKLU87392> Agency on Dec.
      30, "With all their rhetoric about Palestine, there is not much [Hezbollah]
      can do about Gaza, short of getting Lebanon involved in another disaster. So
      they are leading the popular reaction."

      Egypt is not a conduit for Iranian arms either. President Hosni Mubarak is
      caught in a dilemma with regard to Gaza. He receives aid from the United
      States, and has a long-standing peace treaty with Israel. Moreover, his
      secular government is desperately afraid of Islamic extremism, which they
      see as a threat. Because Hamas has a religious base, not a secular one like
      Fatah, its rival for power in the Palestinian community, they are seen as
      dangerous. For this reason, Egypt has kept the border crossing to Gaza
      firmly closed except for humanitarian emergencies.

      Why then does the myth of Iranian military support persist? One reason is
      that it has been a long-standing American foreign policy belief that
      resistance movements cannot exist without state support. Before Iran was
      targeted as the source for support, Libya was the U.S. bogeyman. It is
      instructive to look at rhetoric against Libya from the 1980s and see that
      exactly the same accusations that were leveled at Libya then are being
      hurled at Iran today.

      Finally, Iran does not help matters. The rhetoric of the original Iranian
      revolution is still alive and well in some segments of Iranian political
      life. Iran ousted a Western-supported leader, the Shah, and tried in the
      early days of the revolution to promulgate this action elsewhere in the
      Middle East. Hezbollah and Hamas were sympathetic rhetorical partners. Iran
      supported Hezbollah in its early days, but no longer controls its
      operations. Iran had nothing to do with the founding of Hamas, but sees its
      conflict with Israel as sympathetic with its revolutionary ideals. This does
      not mean that Iran is controlling the action.

      The more apoplectic visions of Iranian involvement see Iran developing
      nuclear weapons and supplying them to both Hezbollah and Hamas. However, not
      only is there no evidence that Iran has a nuclear weapons program; the
      simple logistics of transfer of such weapons to a place like Gaza are
      virtually impossible.

      For Israel, and the world, blaming Iran for its troubles with Hamas does not
      advance the peace process. Nor would attacking Iran mitigate in any way the
      tensions that exist between Israel and its neighbors.

      (F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
      message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
      these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
      within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
      "Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
      The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
      Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
      permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
      if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
      teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
      for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
      as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
      criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
      determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
      substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
      copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
      must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:


      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.