Re: Holy and worldly mathematics
- Dear Father Daniel, bless.
After I quoted « Nikolay Kazantsev's » letter in which he warned that
many parishes might leave, George ironically suggested that I entitle
the subject "why only 144 will be saved". This was ridiculing Nicolay
After his retirement, as far as I know, Vl Seraphim was very silent
and declined to make any declaration. He nevertheless published his
solemn appeal under the pseudonym of Kazantsev a few days before his
death. I reported this. Is this "adding to a long list
of "authorities" used for people's advantage"? Whose advantage do you
have in mind? His? Mine? Did you read the last sentence of the
letter, in which he requests the orthodox to speak out?
I do not equate myself to the Saviour (I took the precaution to
mention this explicitly). However (and again), "Meekness and
humility...should not yield before manifest evil " (Vl Averky).
Instead of a reply to the content of the letter, we have seen only
mockery about numbers and "ad hominem remarks", which suggests that
the letter is really good.
Is the ROCOR hierarchy well informed about whom, even among the
clergy, does support its MP policy?
--- In email@example.com, "orthodoxchurch_sg"
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "vkozyreff"23:10-
> <vladimir.kozyreff@s...> wrote:
> > Dear in Christ Father Daniel and George,
> > Is the Truth on the side of those who ridicule, or on the side of
> > those who are ridiculed?
> > "Then Herod and his soldiers ridiculed and mocked him". (Luke
> > 12)an
> > Please remember that you are not ridiculing me, but Archbishop
> > Seraphim of blessed memory. Remember also that the number of
> > was among Vl Mark's concerns as well.
> So - you put yourself on the level of our Saviour? Interesting. He
> was mocked unjustly - this in no way shows that some ideas do not
> deserve ridicule.
> Please indicate anywhere I ridiculed Archbishop Seraphim ~ this is
> unjust accusation.list
> Sadly it looks like Archbishop Seraphim will be added to a long
> of "authorities" used for people's advantage. For years he is notunable
> mentioned or quoted - the moment he dies (and is conveniently
> to confirm or deny) he is being quoted left right and centre and
> saying this and that to support causes and positions.
> God bless / Fr Daniel
- Dear Mr. Boitchenko,
The most important think for a captain is the safety of the ship and
crew. Captains can take whatever advice they want, but they should
take first the advice of their experienced and respected teachers and
colleagues before they embark for dangerous crossings by new routes
to new destinations.
They should also refer to the classical teaching that they followed
when they were trained. Examples of authoritative messages of caution
to innovative captains have been numerous on this forum recently (See
messages 9613, 9695, 9693, etc.etc).
The fact that those messages of caution are systematically denied,
ignored or deleted by the shipping company is worrying and seems to
sign a change in the latter's policy. The management's denial sounds
like a confirmation. A significant part of the fleet seems to have
been lost and more losses are predicted.
--- In email@example.com, "V. Boitchenko"
> Should captains take advice from "concerned passengers" as well?
> >>As a rule, captains do take the weather warnings into account,
> because their duty is to protect the ship and the crew at any cost
> and because they know that they get severely condemned in case of
> avoidable accident. At sea, captains have an obligation of results,
> and they get condemned even if they took only one precaution when
> they might have taken two of them. I guess you would not be
> reassured, if you were on a ship commanded by a reckless captain,
> with your brothers, sisters and all those who are dear to you.
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]