New Vaccines Don't Use Cells from Aborted Babies
- I have never heard of using the tissue from unborn babies; I also thought
that they were viral cells in a mercury (dangerous!) or formaldehyde
(yuck!) suspension. There certainly were vaccinations before abortions were
made legal, so I am not sure how vaccines were made then.
The tissue aside, we have not vaccinated our kids, yet. I read enough
hair-raising material about the dangers caused by DpT. Allegedly, these
problems have been fixed, but still. There were less cases overall of
permanently injured children in other countries, where vaccinations
commence much later 4-5yrs vs almost @ birth in the US). Read a Shot in the
Dark and also How to Keep Your Child Well in Spite of His Dr (not sure if
this is the exact title, but it is close; most libraries have the books).
MMR has been linked to autism. Search the Daily Telegraph (UK) on line for
many articles. Don't feel pressured (by your pediatrician) if you do not
feel 100% OK with it. Switch doctors if need be. You can also ask for a
religious waiver, which we did (In NYS the waiver is somewhat wide, so
religious beliefs can span personal convictions, which is what we belive.)
Also, some vaccines are available without mercury or formaldehyde, so
insist on these safer alternatives if you must vaccinate.
Sorry that this has absolutely *nothing* to do with the list.... I am sure
I will be flamed by any doctors on the list who believe the dictates of the
AMA and Amer. Pediatrics Assoc. to be Gospel...
At 01:19 PM 9/18/2003, you wrote:
>New Vaccines Don't Use Cells from Aborted Babies[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > by Maria Gallagher
> > LifeNews.com Staff Writer
> > September 14, 2003
> > Clearwater, FL (LifeNews.com) -- Parents ...
> > The vaccines represent a pro-life breakthrough, since they do not
> > contain tissues from aborted unborn children.
>Is this for real?
>I always thought vaccines were on the viral level i.e. somewhere
>smaller than individual cells and tissue.
>If so have we all since 1960's been "protected" from these diseases
>because of the abortion industry? Or is this a recent phenomenon. If
>so for how long? This is very disturbing because even as we try to
>wall off ourselves from bad things we are legislated into having our
>children vaccinated...and this says with the "tissues from aborted