7271Re: TELLING THE TRUTH IS DANGEROUS...
- Dec 31, 2002
> - vl. Vladimir is not able to say a word because Met. Vitaly is notMetropolitan Vitaly's health was deteriorating for a number of years
> ("straw man" fallacy, assumed major)
prior to his personal verbal and written requests to be allowed to
retire "na pokoi". Metropolitan Vitaly retired and a new Metropolitan
was duly elected and enthroned. At the present time even his own loyal
clergy admit that he (Metropolitan Vitaly)is under the control of
Ludmilla Rasnianskaya, who had during his actual reign as head of the
Church controlled access to him and controlled correspondence with
him. She also attempted to hide, cover up and diminish the extent of
> - vl. Varnava is a game playerBishop Varnava was censured, then he was deposed by the Synod of
> (ad hominem + poisoning the well, prejudicial reasoning)
Bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia. Metropolitan
Vitaly had no individual power or privileged to reinstate Varnava.
>Not celebrating the Divine Liturgy, but merely attending the service,
> - vl. Vladimir is not a bishop because he is "so called (vl.)
> (assumed minor, non sequitur, circular reasoning)
retired "na pokoe" Metropolitan Vitaly witnesses the single handed
consecration of archimandrite Sergious by deposed monk Varnava.
Varnava and Archimandrite (non-bishop) Sergious then consecrate
renegade monk Vladimir. Therefore without prejudicial reasoning,
poisoning of the well, straw man fallacy, assumed minor, non sequitur,
circular reasoning or ad hominem; Vladimir IS NOT a Bishop!
Archpriest Stefan Pavlenko
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>