14181Re: Long Live Tsar Michael !!!
- Jun 2, 2005Dear List,
Prince Michael of Kent, son of George, Duke of Kent gave up his right
to the throne in 1978 when he married the Roman Catholic Baroness
Marie-Christine von Reibnitz of Bohemia. They have two children, Lord
Frederick Windsor, born in 1979; and Lady Gabriella Windsor, born in
There was embarrassment in the Eighties when Princess Michael of
Kent's father, Baron Gunther von Reibnitz, was exposed as a former
Nazi party member and SS officer.
" It was being speculated for over a year, but now it appears that
Lady Gabriella Windsor, called Ella and 30th in line to the British
throne, will marry Aatish Taseer, 24-year-old son of the columnist
Tavleen Singh, soon. Prince and Princess Michael Kent will reportedly
announce that their 23-year-old daughter is to marry Aatish early
this year. The Prince and the Princess have no problem with Aatish
who, although born of a Muslim father, is said to be a practising
Sikh. In fact the Princess, who considers Aatish as one of the most
handsome young man, once reportedly said she would have no objection
if Prince Williams married a Muslim girl. .. [India Express Bureau]"
I wonder whether the Prince is not a bit too "open minded" to be a
reasonable candidate for an orthodox throne.
--- In email@example.com, "vkozyreff"
> Dear Roman,however,
> I discussed a few times on this forum the meaning of "do not judge"
> and the necessity to judge for any Christian. Your message,
> is a sum of condemnations and insults of the kind that we shouldBriefly,
> avoid and that is not expected from a historian, in my view.
> your message (whcih is more offensive than the ones you criticised)me,
> says that some members of this List:
> 1. have disappointed you
> 2. are below the expected level
> 3. have shown dizzying lack of charity.
> 4. are "vile" "Conspiracy theorists".
> 5. are "foaming nationalists"
> 6. are "angry juridictionalists".
> 7. are a shame
> 8. are forgetting basics and the fact that their correspondents
> are made in the image of God.
> You add that you have tolerated the above with difficulty and that
> the moderator has failed.
> Concerning your attacks which I felt directed at least in part to
> I woulkd like to stress that:recent
> I am not vile in thinking that there are conspiracies (Vl Averky of
> Syracuse spoke about them).
> I am not a foaming nationalist, but I love Russia.
> I am not an "angry juridictionalist", but I am sad at ROCOR's
> The conversation about racial features on this List is unimportant.
> I would like to say the following about the Russian succession:
> judgement on the Kyrill Vladimirovich line as candidates to thefrom
> throne seems wrong and not very well informed to me, especially
> the spiritual angle. You overlook their treason of the Emperor andof
> Russia in 1917, their absence by the Russian orthodox anticommunist
> patriots in the West, their lack of dignity before Russia's newin
> leaders ad their betraying ROCOR. They have not impressed anybody
> the White Russian emigration. They have never shown any kind ofwe
> I met a few people that had "put themselves at the service of Her
> Highness", who looked like operetta courtisans more than anything
> else and others that had been "ennobled". For years, we have been
> trying to associate them with our actions. The only response that
> received once, is that Her Highness Maria Vladimirovna accepted totopic
> attend a Russian charity ball in Brussels. She only cared about
> winning at the lottery and getting flattered. Prince George is
> working at the European Commission in Brussels. Attempts to
> communicate with him from the Russian orthodox community have been
> In God,
> Vladimir Kozyreff
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Russell Martin"
> <MartinRE@w...> wrote:
> > Dear List,
> > How disappointing. This is a very interesting and important
> that could have spawned any number of edifying and relevantby
> offshoots. But, alas, the thread has gone the way of mutual
> misunderstandings, of misspoken words, of hurt feelings and
> apologies, and of dizzying lack of charity. I have long tolerated
> the vile things that are sometimes said on this list by conspiracy
> theorists, foaming nationalists, and angry jurisdictionalists. But
> am I really alone in thinking that the time has come to go back to
> basics and remember that we all are in a community based on shared
> belief and love, and that the anonymity that one might be afforded
> our computers doesn't allow us to behave as if the person on the
> receiving end of our emails aren't people with feelings and worth,
> all made in the image and likeness of God?
> > What a disappointment. What a shame.
> > Is it time for more energetic moderation of the contributions to
> this list?
> > Roman Martin
> > Russell E. Martin
> > Assoc. Professor of History
> > Westminster College
> > New Wilmington, PA 16172-0001
> > phone: 724.946.6254
> > fax: 724.946.7256
> > webpage: http://www.westminster.edu/staff/martinre/
> > other email: remartin@p...
- << Previous post in topic