Re: [opml-dev] Fw: OPML discussion
- I can't believe the amount of pure drivel one idiot can post in a couple of
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Mitchell" <skeezix@...>
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 1:42 PM
Subject: Re: [opml-dev] Fw: OPML discussion
> On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, Dave Winer wrote:
> > Maybe you should start a new mail list and take these problems with you.
> > But if you do -- puh-leeeze don't call what you do OPML. Thanks.
> Ahh, so OPML is *not* an open format, nor meant to be used as an
> interchange between applications?
> > BTW, the arguing will start there right away -- as it did here --
> > that's why there are no standard attributes, everyone wanted a say in
> > it, and after all the arguing over RSS, that was the last thing I was
> > interested in doing. Anyway, a long way of saying, I'm tired and
> > totally not interested in wrestling with you or anyone else on this.
> > Good luck to you.
> OKay. ITs fair. We all work killer hours per day, so last thing
> you need is to be burdened with this sort of thing.
> So you must evaluate.. isOPML meant tobe open? If so, and you
> haven't the time to maintain it, the bridles of leadership must be passed
> to someone or something else.
> If it is not meant to be open or bandied about as The Outliner XML
> Spec, then perhaps you shoudl clarify that in the OPML spec, so people
> don't try and use it for something it is not.
> "It's murder out there. You can't even travel around in your own micro
> circuits without permission from 'Master Control Program'. I mean,
> sending *ME* down here to play games.... Who does he calculate he is?"
> -- Peter Jurasik as Crom, _Tron_
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/