Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

233Re: [opml-dev] OPML 1.1

Expand Messages
  • Dave Winer
    Dec 3, 2003
    • 0 Attachment
      It's true that examples aren't specs, but beggars can't be choosers.

      I'll take whatever information I can get in whatever form. Let's be detectives. I don't recall Columbo or Sherlock Holmes refusing a clue because it wasn't a spec. ;->


      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Jeremy Bowers
      To: opml-dev@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 4:35 PM
      Subject: Re: [opml-dev] OPML 1.1

      Jeremy Bowers wrote:
      > I think it would be worth having authors catalog what their software
      > *outputs* as well. It's (somewhat) fine to accept any case tags, but
      > OPML is specified as XML, so the case should be honored and programs
      > outputting wrong cases should be considered broken according to the
      > current spec.

      Clarification: By "catalog what their software outputs" I mean actual
      specifications and promises, not just example OPML files their system
      outputs. Examples aren't specs.

      Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

      To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

      Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • Show all 15 messages in this topic