230Re: [opml-dev] OPML 1.1
- Dec 2, 2003Jeremy Bowers wrote:
> I think it would be worth having authors catalog what their softwareClarification: By "catalog what their software outputs" I mean actual
> *outputs* as well. It's (somewhat) fine to accept any case tags, but
> OPML is specified as XML, so the case should be honored and programs
> outputting wrong cases should be considered broken according to the
> current spec.
specifications and promises, not just example OPML files their system
outputs. Examples aren't specs.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>