9/11: Charles H. Krohn: "One of the aircraft's engines somehow ricocheted out of the building"
- FWIW: Krohn's account is consistent with my theory that theport engine lost kinetic energy and "bounced" off the Pentagonand back onto the ground next to the building line.Clearly, a final approach of about 45 degrees to the building linewould have caused the starboard engine to hit first; and,the damages it caused to the Pentagon's bearing columnsthere would necessarily explain an instantaneous loss ofkinetic energy (action/reaction in physics).Kee, we could use your physics expertise to substantiatethis aspect of kinetic energy "loss" from the starboard engine'sinitial impact against the Pentagon.[excerpt]Charles H Krohn: One of the aircraft's engines somehow ricocheted out of the building and arched into the Pentagon's mall parking area between the main building and the new loading dock facility, said Charles H. Krohn, the Army's deputy chief of public affairs. Those fleeing the building heard a loud secondary explosion about 10 min. after the initial impact.[emphases added][/excerpt]Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
All Rights Reserved without Prejudicecopy: The Internet
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around