Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Private Attorney General in USA Comments Re: "Noam Chomsky and the Willful Ignorance of 9/11," by Kevin Ryan 11/29/2013)

Expand Messages
  • Supreme Law Firm
    On Friday, November 29, 2013 1:15 PM, Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.   wrote:
    Message 1 of 1 , Nov 29, 2013

      On Friday, November 29, 2013 1:15 PM, "Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S."  wrote:


      Noam Chomsky and the Willful Ignorance of 9/11

      Hello Kevin,

      Thanks for the incisive summary above.

      We can all put a metric tonne of verified material evidence under the noses of people like Chomsky and David Ray Griffin;  however, if their medical cases of acute cognitive dissonance are as serious as I suspect, their foregone conclusions can be expected to filter that evidence every single time.

      My office lodged a VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT against Bush / Cheney / Rumsfeld, that is bolstered by an extensive amount of documentary evidence calling for the conclusion that the run-up to the Iraq invasion was planned far in advance of 9/11/2001. 

      Secretary of the Treasury Paul H. O'Neill witnessed Cabinet meetings where the attack on Iraq was openly discussed, and he was fired by GW most probably because O'Neill had protested that advance planning.

      One of the documents incorporated as a formal Exhibit was a detailed study of nuclear proliferation by the State of Israel, published at Maxwell AFB two years to the month prior to 9/11

      In that report, the "yellow cake" (uranium oxide) was transferred to the Israeli secret police for immediate transport to Israel's nuclear reactor in the Negev Desert in Southern Israel.  So much for the lie that Iraq had imported that yellow cake.

      Another horrific example of premeditated negligence is the refusal of people like Chomsky and Griffin to confront the detailed photographic evidence of aircraft debris which remained at the Pentagon until all of it was removed. 

      Our pro bono assistance to U.S. Coast Guard Investigations in San Diego uncovered a key photo of two PLANAR fuselage sections, one of which shows the telltale external refueling line still attached.  Boeing 757s have an obviously cylindrical fuselage, and NO external refueling lines;  and, there are very few U.S. military aircraft which have BOTH a rectangular fuselage AND an external refueling line (cf. U.S. Navy A-3 Skywarrior).

      Our surviving hypothesis is that the Office of Naval Intelligence ("ONI") was already ONTO the run-up to 9/11, and members of the USAF were already locked into a long-standing pattern of resource competition with the U.S. Navy e.g. $2.3 TRILLION reported missing by Rumsfeld at his press conference on 9/10/2001 (the day before).

      The hits on the WTC triggered an emergency meeting of Naval Commanders at the Naval Command Center, where they were sitting ducks for a precision attack by an AGM followed immediately by a modified A-3 Skywarrior packed with TNT and jet fuel.  Those explosions also took out the adjacent offices where the missing $2.3 TRILLION was being actively investigated by Pentagon forensic accountants.

      Another facet of the Pentagon attack is the report we received that Captain Gerald DeConto was on the telephone to the Secretary of the Navy, to request verbal authorization to "engage the incoming".  There is only ONE REASON why DeConto would have been requesting that verbal authorization:  the Pentagon's automatic fire control system was tricked into standing down, most probably by a friendly transponder identification beacon which had been installed on that modified A-3 Skywarrior.

      A Russian surveillance satellite reportedly photographed its launch from the flight deck of the USS George Washington, which was anchored off the coast of Long Island that morning.

      Then, there is the full El Al Boeing 747 which departed JFK at 4:11 PM on 9/11/2001, destination David Ben Gurion International Airport in Tel Aviv:  that flight departed in obvious violation of the grounding order issued earlier that day by Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, and its take-off was assisted by U.S. Military ground crews, most probably USAF (again).

      Can you say "getaway vehicle"?

      In summary, the best and most powerful single litmus test you can apply to these fakers and phonies is the hit on the Pentagon:  if anyone tries to tell you that a Boeing 757 crashed into the "E" Ring that morning, you will know instantly where they are coming from!

      Further reading:




      Sincerely yours,
      /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
      Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
      http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

      All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.