Re: Supreme Law Firm asks a simple question about Boston Marathon: "How many 'contractors' were hurt?"
- ----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: Supreme Law Firm asks a simple question about Boston Marathon: "How many 'contractors' were hurt?"
http://www.naturalnews.com/039977_The_Craft_Boston_marathon_private_military_contractors.htmlMike Adams, The Health Ranger, writes:
Photos: Private military operatives hired to 'work' the Boston marathon with black backpacks, radiation detectors, tactical gear
What does it all mean?First off, let's get the attacks of the moron trolls out of the way -- people who will say these photos are a "conspiracy theory."
How are photos of actual people at the event a conspiracy theory?
They aren't. In real police work, they're called "evidence," and the people in these photos should be persons of interest.
But they aren't. The entire mainstream media and law enforcement apparatus is now pretending these men don't exist. (Now that's their conspiracy theory!)
We all know, however, that The Craft operatives don't work for free. They aren't a band of volunteers. And that means somebody paid them to be at the event.
Who paid The Craft to be there? And what was their mission?
Why is their existence at the Boston marathon being memory-holed? Why are they not "persons of interest" in the investigation?
Why do they carry radiation detectors? What's in their backpacks? (A ham sandwich?)
The fact that the media refuses to even acknowledge the existence of these private military operatives is quite telling all by itself.---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@...>
Date: Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:49 AM
Subject: Supreme Law Firm asks a simple question about Boston Marathon:
"How many 'contractors' were hurt?"http://www.activistpost.com/2013/04/contractors-at-boston-marathon-stood.html
Who were they?
What were they and the FBI doing?
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice