Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

"The general term "income" is not defined in the Internal Revenue Code." U.S. v. Ballard, 535 F.2d 400, 404

Expand Messages
  • Supreme Law Firm
    ... From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Sent: Monday, April 8, 2013 9:37 AM Subject: The general term income is not defined in the Internal Revenue
    Message 1 of 1 , Apr 8, 2013
    • 0 Attachment


      ----- Forwarded Message -----
      From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
      Sent: Monday, April 8, 2013 9:37 AM
      Subject: "The general term "income" is not defined in the Internal Revenue Code." U.S. v. Ballard, 535 F.2d 400, 404

      http://supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/chapter7.htm

      The general term "income" is not defined in the Internal Revenue Code.

      [U.S. v. Ballard, 535 F.2d 400, 404]

      Here's that full decision:

      http://supremelaw.org/decs/ballard/535F.2d400.htm
      http://supremelaw.org/decs/ballard/US.v.Ballard.535.F2d.400%281976%29.pdf

      The general term "income" is not defined in the Internal Revenue Code.


      For more case law on the meaning of "income" as distinct from
      compensation for services rendered, see also:

      http://supremelaw.org/letters/ftb.htm


      --
      Sincerely yours,
      /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
      Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
      http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
      http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
      http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

      All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.