Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Private Attorney General RESPONDS Re: Federal Framework Being Set Up To Arrest Sheriffs

Expand Messages
  • Supreme Law Firm
    ... Well, the Supremacy Clause elevates the Second Amendment to the supreme Law of the Land: http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#2nd-amend So,
    Message 1 of 1 , Apr 1, 2013
      refusing to enforce the law

      Well, the Supremacy Clause elevates the Second Amendment
      to the supreme Law of the Land:


      So, who is "REFUSING TO ENFORCE THE LAW" in this matter?

      See also:

                  The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose;  since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.  An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed.  Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be[,] had the statute not been enacted.
                  Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it ....
                  A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one.  An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law.  Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby.
                  No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no courts are bound to enforce it.
      [16 Am Jur 2d, Sec. 177, emphasis added]
      Sincerely yours,
      /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
      Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

      All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

      From: danny wayne <bootstrap55@...>
      Sent: Monday, April 1, 2013 6:29 PM
      Subject: FW: Federal Framework Being Set Up To Arrest Sheriffs


      From: bootstrap55@...
      To: ccsoweb@...
      Subject: FW: Federal Framework Being Set Up To Arrest Sheriffs
      Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 01:20:57 +0000

      If the county and the states let this happen..  There is absolutely no constitution and no
      defense to the total takeover of America.. This is very bad, but if the counties start talking
      to the people of their county and get a plan of action, they can  still be stopped.
      For instance, get the National Guard commanders for Oregon and find out how important
      their Oath of office is.  You must take some high ranking sheriffs and begin meeting with
      these Officers, if you are not already.  They can be made to see the real danger coming our
      way, and if they believe the people will back them up they may stand with you. 
      I can tell you this is very serious and a dash to destroy everything our Nation stands for.
      They are out to enslave us all.  They are running out of time and will hurt anyone & everyone
      they can going out.
      Please take this very serious......Dan

      Reposted from dailypaul
      Secret Service to Arrest Sheriffs
      Credit:  American Conservative
      Colorado, and apparently Texas (next) are being targeted with an attempt to set up a federal authority framework that will enable Secret Service agents (not just those guarding the president), and others of the U.S. Secret Service including uniformed division officers, physical security technicians and specialists, and other ‘special officers’, to arrest and remove an elected sheriff for refusing to enforce the law (or anyone breaking the law).  The bills being introduced defines law as including any rule, regulation, executive order, court order, statute or constitutional provision.  
      Why are they doing this? Here’s why...
      It would establish federal authority police powers in a State, enabling an enforcement arm reporting directly to the president (Secret Service). It would enable the president / executive branch to theoretically override the actions and preventative measures that are now being taken by many States throughout the country who are trying to preserve 2nd Amendment gun rights and who are prohibiting the enforcement of unconstitutional law passed by Congress or pushed by executive order.
      As some of you may know, a growing list of sheriffs (more than 340 so far) across the country have expressed that they will not enforce a Washington mandate that clearly violates the Second Amendment. Many State laws to preserve gun rights are gaining momentum. States include Montana, Ohio, Kentucky, Idaho, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona, Michigan, Utah, and New Mexico.  However, in Colorado, Senate Bill SB-13-013 has evidently just passed, and is now ready to be signed by the governor, giving police powers and arrest authority to the federal/executive branch of government (Secret Service) within the State.   In Texas a similar bill has just been introduced in the State legislature.
      The president and vice-president Biden have been actively pursuing state legislatures and pushing for passage of the bills. Obama is scheduled to visit Colorado in just a few days. “Colorado is a pawn for the Obama-Biden plan,” and then on to the next... at least those that won’t fall into line.  It is a full court press by the federal government to empower themselves even further by inserting themselves as police authority within the state, to eliminate opposition.

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.