Private Attorney General's OBJECTIONS Re: Awesome Research [sic] = SAME LIE KEEPS CIRCULATING!!!
- ----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 8:55 AM
Subject: Private Attorney General's OBJECTIONS Re: Awesome Research [sic] = SAME LIE KEEPS CIRCULATING!!!
Are you having problems with memory loss, or reading disability?
If not, you're starting to show symptoms of charlatans.
Charlatan n. a person making unusually showy pretenses
to knowledge or ability : FRAUD, FAKER
-- The Merriam-Webster Dictionary (paperback edition)
THIS ISSUE HAS COME UP HUNDREDS OF TIMES HERE ALREADY (????)
"Awesome Research" [sic] ?? NOT!!!
> a "Corporation" with a legislature was established,
with all the apparatus of a distinct government created (Incorporated)
by (Presidential) Legislative Act, February 21, 1871
Forty-first Congress, Session III, Chapter 62, page 419
The "United States" is NOT a corporation: U.S. v. Cooper Corporation
In United States v. Cooper Corporation, 312 U.S. 600 (1941),the Supreme Court wrote:http://laws.findlaw.com/us/312/600.html"We may say in passing that the argument that theUnited States may be treated as a corporationorganized under its own laws, that is, under theConstitution as the fundamental law, seems so strainedas not to merit serious consideration."
NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES I TELL YOU PEOPLE
THAT THIS IS A LIE, IT KEEPS COMING UP AND
IT KEEPS GETTING POSTED IN MY INBOX.
WHEN ARE YOU PEOPLE EVER GOING TO LEARN???
28 U.S.C. 3002 did NOT incorporate the Federal government.
Just replace "corporation" with "existing corporation" in that statute:
The "United States" was not an "existing corporation" when that
statute was enacted.
Also, that statute is just another example of Federal statutes which
arbitrarily re-define "United States"; but, the U.S. Supreme Court
has already told Congress that it may NOT re-define ANY
terms that occur in the U.S. Constitution: the term "United States"
is rather central, and pivotal, to numerous provisions of that
IT TAKES A LOT MORE TEXT THAN THAT ONE LINE OF CODE
TO CREATE A FEDERAL CORPORATION!
If you had bothered to read just one such Act of Congress --
creating an EXISTING Federal corporation -- you would already
know that numerous issues need to be decided in such an
"organic" Act: e.g. Board of Directors, purpose of the corporation,
officers, initial stock offering(s), initial capitalization, etc.
Moreover, lots of cities and counties are municipal corporations;
all California counties are "bodies corporate" by Act of the
California Legislature: SO THIS IS NO BIG DEAL!!!
D.C. is a municipal corporation. NO BIG DEAL!!!
STOP BEING STUPID, PLEASE!!
People who already know better are starting to question
your [lack of] ability to recognize the truth
when it's right under your nose (for the 100th time already!)
p.s. By 8:00 AM tomorrow morning, will you have already forgotten what I showed you above??
If you have NOT forgotten the above by tomorrow morning,
maybe you'll take the time to read the following brief,
in which we got to the bottom of this LIE:
The “government” did not bring this suit. The U.S. Department of Justice has no powers of attorney legally to represent any one of the 50 States of the Union, nor all of them collectively. 28 U.S.C. 547. The 50 States of the Union are already quite adequately represented legally by their respective State Attorneys General. 28 U.S.C. 530B.Moreover, in Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920), the Supreme Court prohibited Congress from re-defining any terms used in the Constitution for the United States of America (“U.S. Constitution”). At 28 U.S.C. 1746, both “United States” and “United States of America” occur in correct contradistinction to each other (inside one is outside the others). 28 U.S.C. 1746 is the only statute in all of Title 28 where the term “United States of America” occurs as such.The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA [sic] did incorporate twice as such in the State of Delaware, but certified evidence now before this Court shows that both foreign corporations have been revoked by the Delaware Secretary of State. Neither foreign corporation was ever registered with the New Mexico Secretary of State either! (See “Certificate”!)Even if one or the other were not revoked, DOJ would still not have any powers of attorney legally to represent a foreign Delaware corporation. Congress never appropriated funds for DOJ to do so.
Finally, Congress has never incorporated either the “United States” or the “United States of America” as such. See U.S. v. Cooper Corporation, 312 U.S. 600 (1941). It appears that Chief Justice John Marshall was responsible for fabricating the myth that “The United States of America” are a corporation. See Dixon v. The United States, 1 Marsh. Dec. 177, 181 (1811). However, without citing any actual legislative authority for that proposition, Marshall’s statement is merely dictum that was later cited in Bouvier’s Law Dictionary (1856), at the definitions of “Union” and “United States of America”. In any event, Dixon has been overruled by Cooper supra because Dixon was decided by a Circuit Court in a case on which C.J. Marshall presided.
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)
All Rights Reserved without PrejudiceOn Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:28 AM, colanthelv <colanthelv@...> wrote:
--Wow, exhaustive research! You need to know, now read it and forward it to anyone and everyone.Fraternally,Matthewhttp://www.usavsus.info