Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: "404 Not Found" errors at www.supremelaw.org

Expand Messages
  • Supreme Law Firm
    www.supremelaw.org is back up now.   Sincerely yours, /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
    Message 1 of 2 , Jun 30, 2012
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment
      www.supremelaw.org is back up now.
       
      Sincerely yours,
      /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
      Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
      http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
      http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

      All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

      From: Daniel Seigler <therealbeadweaver2002@...>
      To: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
      Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 2:36 PM
      Subject: Re: "404 Not Found" errors at www.supremelaw.org

      ty
       

      From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
      To: Daniel Seigler <therealbeadweaver2002@...>
      Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 11:35 AM
      Subject: "404 Not Found" errors at www.supremelaw.org

      Re: http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/wanted.one.courageous.journalist.htm


      Our website may be under attack presently.

      However, I checked with Tech Support and
      they have already posted this Status Report:

      [begin quote]

      The storage your home is on will be offline for a short maintenance.

      The downtime will hopefully be lesser than a hour.


      Update:

      We encountered some problems here so the downtime is longer than expected..
      We hope to have the storage back operational in about 30 minutes.


      [end quote]
       
      Sincerely yours,
      /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
      Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
      http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
      http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

      All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
      From: Daniel Seigler <therealbeadweaver2002@...>
      To: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
      Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 9:02 AM
      Subject: Re: [CCCC-USA] WANTED! One courageous journalist, alternative or not, willing to report extensive infiltration of the Federal Judiciary ...


      From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
      To: Daniel Seigler <therealbeadweaver2002@...>
      Cc: "jz12345@..." <jz12345@...>
      Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 6:37 AM
      Subject: Re: [CCCC-USA] WANTED! One courageous journalist, alternative or not, willing to report extensive infiltration of the Federal Judiciary ...

      WANTED! One courageous journalist, alternative or not,
      willing to report extensive infiltration of the Federal Judiciary ...


      http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/wanted.one.courageous.journalist.htm
       
      Sincerely yours,
      /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
      Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
      http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
      http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

      All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

      From: Daniel Seigler <therealbeadweaver2002@...>
      To: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
      Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 9:06 PM
      Subject: Re: [CCCC-USA]
      WANTED! One courageous journalist, alternative or not,
      willing to report extensive infiltration of the Federal Judiciary ...


      With respect sir, i wish permission to post the memo link, the memo body, and your permission to a publicly accessable website.  I claim no responsibility for the website.  I do claim responsibility for my posts on the website.  The website is http://theperiledsea.ning.com/ . i suggest you take a look around before answering.  Replying requesting further information is always acceptable before answer, and those that concern the permissions would b eposted also, to ensure reliability.

      From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
      To: paulandrewmitchell2004@...
      Sent: Sunday, June 5, 2011 10:26 AM
      Subject: [CCCC-USA] WANTED! One courageous journalist, alternative or not, willing to report extensive infiltration of the Federal Judiciary ...

      Subject: Wanted! One courageous journalist, alternative or not,
      willing to report extensive infiltration of the Federal Judiciary ...

      http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/uoregon.edu/memo.ag01.htm

      http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/evidence.folders.2004-03-16.htm
      (see all "NAD" links)

      http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/index.htm


      There is A Conspiracy, and it is manifested and discoverable
      by any diligent study of American History, dating at least
      from the end of the American Civil War:

      http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/knudson/judnot09.htm#dyett  (27 < 28)


      For example, both State and Federal Governments have fraudulently
      re-classified most Americans into a bogus class known as "federal citizens".

      But, that second, inferior class did not exist prior to the Civil War, and
      that second, inferior class is still not eligible to serve in the U.S. Senate,
      the House of Representative, or the White House.

      http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/citizenship.for.dummies.htm

      http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/comments.on.citizenship.for.dummies.htm

      http://www.supremelaw.org/press/rels/correct.amendment.htm


      Moreover, an obvious "Sea Change" occurred throughout the Federal Judiciary
      on June 25, 1948, when Congress was duped into approving an
      unlawful switch from constitutional courts to legislative tribunals, where
      fundamental Rights are now treated as "options" and not as "mandates":

      http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol/cert.htm#drama

      http://www.supremelaw.org/press/rels/cracking.title.28.htm

      http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/microsoft/transmittal.htm
      (drafted by this author, for a litigation trainee)


      And, that same "Sea Change" was also attempted in the Federal Criminal Code --
      using the exact same ruse:  an "Abrogation Clause" that obviously violates
      Separation of Powers and the ex post facto Prohibition in the Constitution:

      http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/court.conspiracy.exposed.htm



      And, this continues to persist, despite a correct Supreme Court holding
      that Rules of Court may not expand or restrict original jurisdiction
      conferred by Acts of Congress


      http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=503&invol=131



      --
      Sincerely yours,
      /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
      Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
      http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
      http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
      http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

      All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

      On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 2:00 AM, joseph zernik <jz12345@...> wrote:
      Wanted! One courageous US law professor to opine on evidence of racketeering in the US courts!

      Detailed evidence has been forwarded to hundreds of top US law professors and the American Bar Association, seeking their opinion on the integrity, or lack thereof, in the electronic record systems of the US courts.  The claim is that through fraud in the systems, US judges established a racketeering enterprise.  The systems have been in place for about a decade now.  Yet no evidence has been discovered yet of a single US judge or US law professor, who protested the apparent fraud and extortion in the US courts.

       []      []    []        []

      Los Angeles, June 5 – “The US courts have descended to a level of corruption that has not been seen in over a century,” claim William Windsor, of LawlessAmerica.com [i] and Joseph Zernik, of Human Rights Alert (NGO). [ii]  Detailed evidence, produced by Windsor and Zernik, has been forwarded to hundreds of professor in top US law schools, documenting large-scale fraud in the electronic record systems of the US courts, PACER and CM/ECF. [iii,iv] 

      Windsor and Zernik claim that through such fraud, US judges, as a class, have established a racketeering enterprise in the US courts from coast to coast, which enables simulated litigation of cases before the courts, and abuse of the Human, Constitutional, and Civil Rights of the People. [v]

      The evidence, now forwarded to US law professors, has been internationally peer-reviewed and accepted: [vi]
      • By the United Nations official Staff Report, as part of 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States.
      • By law enforcement and computer science experts.
      • In peer-reviewed scholarly papers published in an international computer science journal with an Editorial Board listing scholars from six European nations and Canada.
      • In presentations for peer-reviewed international scholarly computer science and criminology conferences.
      However, Windsor and Zernik hope to obtain opinions on the matter also by US law professors.

      According to Windsor and Zernik, conditions that have emerged in the US justice system in the decade since the systems were implemented in the courts are unprecedented in any modern “Western Democracy.”  “It is not reasonably possible that any competent, well qualified US judge, from the district courts to the US Supreme Court, or any competent law professor is not aware of what is taking place in the US courts.  Yet, we are not aware of a single US judge or law professor, who protested the alleged fraud and extortion committed on the People in the US courts.”

      Windsor and Zernik hope that they will be able to obtain at least one opinion of a US law professor, either reaffirming or refuting their claims of fraud in PACER and CM/ECF.

      “The situation is unprecedented, since the systems were universally implemented by the Administrative Office of the US Courts.  Therefore, the resulting conditions are not sporadic.  Instead, implementation of these invalid record systems in the US courts undermines the foundation of the US Constitution, which the US judges have a unique role in protecting.”

      Windsor and Zernik believe that if the US Constitution is restored, there would be a need to establish a Truth and Reconciliation Commission on the US judges.  Truth and Reconciliation Commissions have been set up by other nations after emerging from periods of internal unrest, civil war, or dictatorship. [vii]

      “It is simply impossible to impeach so many US judges at once,” they conclude.

      The evidence and requests for opinions have also been forwarded to the American Bar Association. 

      The American Bar Association’s motto is “Defending Liberty, Pursuing Justice” and a stated goal is “To Advance the Rule of Law.”

      LINKS:
      ______
      [i] LawlessAmerica.com
      www.LawlessAmerica.com
      [ii] Human Rights Alert (NGO)
      http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
      [iii] 11-06-03 The case of William Windsor: Alleged racketeering in the US Court, Northern District of Georgia, is enabled by the large-scale fraud in the electronic record systems of the US Courts (PACER and CM/ECF)
      http://www.scribd.com/doc/56995708/
      [iv] 11-06-02  DRAFT Request for US Attorney General Eric Holder's investigation of Integrity, or lack thereof, of electronic record systems of the US courts
      http://www.scribd.com/doc/56893149/
      [v] Simulated Litigation, Simulated Minutes, Orders, Judgments, Dockets are used here in the sense established in the Texas Penal Code:
      Texas Penal Code
       32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS.
      (a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
              (1)  induce payment of a claim from another person;  or                     
              (2)  cause another to:                                                      
              (A) submit to the putative authority of the document;  or               
              (B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.   
      (b)  Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
      [vi] 11-05-08 Joseph Zernik, PhD, Biographical Sketch
      http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/
      [vii] Truth and Reconciliation Commission
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth_and_reconciliation_commission

      ____

      Joseph Zernik, PhD
      Human Rights Alert (NGO)
      []  
      Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.
      _______ 
      []  
      Flag Counter: 119
      http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ 
      http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/
      http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
      Total Reads: 449,060
      Followers: 682
      http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
      http ://twitter.com/inproperinla
      http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
      Total Item Views: 361,338
      http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
      _____________________________
      WHAT DID THE EXPERT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS?
      * "...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences."
      http://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/
      Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)
      _____________________________
      WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
      * "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
      Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
      http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
      * "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."    
      Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
      http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/
      * "Innocent people remain in prison"
      * "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
      LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
      http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/ /
      _____________________________
      WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
      * "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."
      United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)
      http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
      _____________________________
      WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
      *
      "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."
      Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)
      http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
      _____________________________
      WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?
      * "More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others."
      More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011)
      http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/
      _____________________________
      WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
      * "The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition..."
      Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003)
      http://www.scribd.com/doc/50137887/
      _____________________________
      WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
      * In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice.
      Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)
      http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/

      _____












    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.