Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

9 County Sheriffs Announce Press Conference t o Call for Holder’s Resignation

Expand Messages
  • Supreme Law Firm
    ... From: Paul Andrew Mitchell Sent: Friday, October 7, 2011 8:54 AM Subject: Re: Fw: 9 US Sheriffs Announce Press Conference to
    Message 1 of 1 , Oct 7, 2011
    • 0 Attachment

      ----- Forwarded Message -----
      From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@...>
      Sent: Friday, October 7, 2011 8:54 AM
      Subject: Re: Fw: 9 US Sheriffs Announce Press Conference to Call for Holder’s Resignation

      http://themadjewess.com/2011/10/06/9-us-sheriffs-announce-press-conference-to-call-for-holders-resignation-occupy-phoenix/


      Greetings Pinal County Sheriffs:

      Please also be advised the Eric Holder's OPM SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS are fatally defective, because they do not display the OMB control number mandated by the Paperwork Reduction Act.

      That form is also missing the bottom paragraph citing 5 U.S.C. 2903:

      http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-06-09/affidavit.refused.JPG
      http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-06-09/affidavit.GIF
      http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-06-09/page01.GIF

      http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-04-28/

      http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/foia.request.holder.htm

      http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/foia.request.holder.opm.htm


      Public Protection Clause in the Paperwork Reduction Act is at 44 U.S.C. 3512:

      http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/44/3512.html

      (b) The protection provided by this section may be raised in the form of a complete defense, bar, or otherwise at any time during the agency administrative process or judicial action applicable thereto.


      Thank you!



      Sincerely yours,
      /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
      Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
      Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
      http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm
      http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

      All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

      On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:28 AM, william-richard <WRN41@...> wrote:
       
       
      -------Original Message-------
       
      Subject: 9 US Sheriffs Announce Press Conference to Call for Holder’s Resignation
       
      Oct 06 23:50

      9 US Sheriffs Announce Press Conference to Call for Holder’s Resignation

      9 US Sheriffs Announce Press Conference to Call for Holder’s Resignation /
      Watch for this tomorrow. The racist Holder is going to answer to someone quickly. But can Hussein keep the cover-up?
      Via ABC 15
      Tomorrow: Stories to watch in Arizona
      OPERATION FAST AND FURIOUS
      Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu and nine other elected sheriffs will hold a press conference to discuss ATF’s “Operation Fast and Furious.” 11am, Arizona Peace Officers Memorial, Wesley Bolin Plaza, Phoenix.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmI7RQJVruA
      9 US Sheriffs Announce Press Conference to Call for Holder's Resignation
      -- 
      CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE 3527.  The law helps the vigilant, 
      before those who sleep on their rights.
      
      "A statute does not trump the Constitution." 
      People v. Ortiz, (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th at p. 292, fn. 2 
      Conway v. Pasadena Humane Society (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 163
      UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JERRY ARBERT POOL, C.A. No. 09-10303, 
      IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 
      (Opinion filed September 14, 2010), On Appeal From The United 
      States District Court For The Eastern District of California
      
      A statutory privilege cannot override a defendant's constitutional 
      right.  People v. Reber, (1986) 177 Cal.App.3d. 523 [223 Cal.Rptr. 
      139}; Vela v. Superior Ct, 208 Cal.App.3d. 141 [255 Cal.Rptr. 921], 
      however, "the judiciary has a solemn obligation to insure that the 
      constitutional right of an accused to a fair trial is realized.  If 
      that right would be thwarted by enforcement of a statute, the state
      ....must yield." 
      Vela v. Superior Ct., 208 Cal.App.3d. 141 [255 Cal.Rptr. 921
      
      Obviously, administrative agencies, like police officers must obey 
      the Constitution and may not deprive persons of constitutional rights.
      Southern Pac. Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities Com., 18 Cal.3d 308
      [S.F. No. 23217. Supreme Court of California. November 23, 1976.]
      
      If evidence of a fact is clear, positive, uncontradicted and 
      of such nature it cannot rationally be disbelieved, the court 
      must instruct that fact has been established as a matter of law. 
      Roberts v. Del Monte Properties Co., 111 CA2d. 69 (1952)
      
      If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to 
      worry about answers.
      Thomas Pynchon
      
      They will do whatever we let them get away with.  
      Joseph  Heller
      
      
       
      --



    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.