"The Last Second: A Forensic Analysis of the Pentagon Murder Weapon's Final Approach," by Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Private Attorney General
- See also:
http://www.supremelaw.org/ authors/mitchell/executive. summary.htmSubject: "The Last Second: A Forensic Analysis of the Pentagon Murder Weapon's Final Approach," by Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Private Attorney General
"The Last Second: A Forensic Analysis of the Pentagon Murder Weapon's Final Approach"
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General (18 U.S.C. 1964(a))
[ W O R K I N G D R A F T #1 ]
This analysis relies heavily upon the attached diagram,
which is also here on the Internet:
The reader is encouraged to print a hard copy of that diagram
while reviewing what follows.
The letter "P" represents the Pentagon's exterior wall,
at the point of impact on the morning of 9/11/2001.
The letter "A" represents an Aircraft that crashed into
the Pentagon at point "P".
Four different points in time are represented by the
circled numbers 1, 2, 3 and 4.
The symbols A1, A2, A3, A4 and A5 represent
points at which A's final trajectory intersects with
the shock wave from an intense blast at epicenter "P".
An air-to-ground missile ("AGM") is mounted on a
missile pylon on the underside of A's port wing.
The object of this exercise is to determine
what would have been the optimal point in time
for the Aircraft to launch the AGM at target "P".
Assume that A is incoming at more than 300 knots
(300 nautical miles per hour), probably faster.
Point "1" is a theoretical construct in which
the Aircraft hits point "P" without launching the AGM.
Point "2" is a more realistic construct in which
the AGM has been launched and hits the Pentagon
before the Aircraft's nose arrives at point "P", and
the Aircraft arrives to meet a very high pressure
shock wave -- high enough to cause destructive,
disintegrating damage to that Aircraft.
Point "3" is another realistic construct in which
the AGM has been launched and hits the Pentagon
long enough before the Aircraft arrives to attenuate
the shock wave sufficiently to cause only minor
turbulence through which the Aircraft must pass.
Point "4" represents the Aircraft with the AGM
still mounted under its port-side wing, both of
which are traveling at a terminal velocity
in excess of 300 knots. Here, the Aircraft is
about one second away from hitting point "P".
The problem we wish to address now is this:
at what exact point in time should the AGM be
launched from the Aircraft, to satisfy all of the
(a) if the AGM is launched too soon, the
Pentagon's automatic fire control system
will have enough time to detect the incoming
and activate its own systems of defense,
e.g. anti-aircraft guns shoot a wall of lead
that will destroy the AGM when it hits that wall;
(b) if the AGM is launched too late, the
Aircraft hits the Pentagon before the missile
can soften an entrance hole through which
the fuselage can travel deeper into the Pentagon's
interior office spaces; think of a mosquito hitting
a car windshield at 70 mph;
(c) if the AGM is launched and its warhead
detonates so as to soften an entrance hole
for the Aircraft's fuselage to pass through,
the launch timing may be late enough for the shock wave
to meet the incoming Aircraft when that shock wave
is very intense, causing very destructive, disintegrating
damages to the Aircraft;
(d) ideally, the AGM should be launched
and its warhead detonated with precise timing that
causes the shock wave to attenuate enough
that it causes only minor turbulence through which
the incoming Aircraft must pass, but without
suffering any destructive/disintegrating damages
before the Aircraft actually reaches point "P".
For some of the following reasons, we think that (c) above
is the most probable scenario.
Put yourself at the controls of a remote computer monitor
and system, which displays the view from an on-board
video camera mounted in the Aircraft's cockpit.
You may be seated in another nearby aircraft,
or you may be seated in an office on the other
side of the Pentagon.
You have rehearsed this moment numerous times.
You must "pull the trigger" launching the AGM
at precisely the right moment, in order to satisfy
all of the above constraints.
You pull the trigger, but what you have not anticipated
are the delays, or latencies, that exist in all of the
intervening electronic steps that must occur perfectly
and in perfect sequence.
There are delays in the telecommunications pathways
connecting you and the AGM's launch mechanism.
You have failed to take those latencies fully into account
during all of your rehearsals.
In order to "err" on the side of greatest confidence
in your abilities, you avoid launching the AGM too early,
and wait until the very last moment.
You pull the trigger, but the latencies give the
incoming Aircraft just a few more milliseconds
to reach the Pentagon at a point where the
resulting blast wave is still very intense.
That shock wave is so intense, it severs the
Aircraft's fuselage amidship, blowing the aft half
away from the Pentagon and onto the grass
The Pentagon's closed circuit television camera ("cctv")
records evidence of the Aircraft's instant disintegration
at Points "A4" and "A5" in the attached diagram:
The latter 2 photos are at a relatively high resolution,
so Pentagon personnel are promptly ordered to
re-sample all of the 5 cctv frames before they are
released to the public and to the major media
like CNN and the BBC.
Also, the one frame which does show any part
of the incoming Aircraft, is deliberately altered
by "air brushing" a purple-like color over the
fuselage that is forward of the visible tail section,
and nowhere else in that one key photo:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gwbush/pentagon/the_plane.gif (lo res)
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gwbush/pentagon/majic1a.jpg (hi res)
... and certainly not where the nose and front one-third
fuselage of a Boeing 757 would have appeared in that photo,
if tail sections were aligned and superimposed, like this:
That particular purple-like color does not appear at the same
pixel locations in ANY of the preceding frames, nor in any
of the subsequent frames of the full cctv frame set.
Those re-sampled photos have a much lower pixel resolution,
which makes it intentionally impossible to verify forensic details
that are readily apparent in the high resolution versions.
Such deliberate alterations of evidence of a murder weapon
is a serious FELONY Federal offense, to be construed as
aiding and abetting premeditated murder in the first degree and/or
murder-for-hire. Such a crime is on the order of hindering
the apprehension of a suspect who is guilty of a homicide.
In Seattle, Washington State, 2 defendants were recently found
guilty of hindering the apprehension of Maurice Clemmons
after he murdered 4 police officers in Lakewood, Washington,
on November 29, 2009.
[more to follow]
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice