Re: IRS Asked to Revoke A-I-P-A-C's Tax Exemption
- > IRS comissioner is "Schulman" if as I suspect a member of the tribe,
> who will avoid revoking the tax exempt status of A-I-P-A-C.
Good point: our extensive investigation of the IRS has revealed
that they were never created by any known Act of Congress:
31 U.S.C. 301 thru 313:
Instead, by all available evidence they appear to be what was left over
of "The Untouchables" after Alcohol Prohibition was repealed.
We think the Women's Temperance Movement was secretly financed
by the petroleum cartel, in order to perfect a monopoly in automotive fuels:
once that monopoly was perfected, Prohibition was repealed,
leaving alcohol high and dry as the preferred fuel for cars and trucks,
and leaving a federal police force inside the several States --
to continue extorting money from the American People.
More support for these conclusions can be found in the holding
in U.S. v. Constantine: the Federal Alcohol Administration could no longer
operate legally inside the several States after Prohibition was repealed;
but, a compromise was reached which allowed them to retreat to San Juan,
Puerto Rico using a false and rebuttable theory that the guarantees of the
Constitution did not extend into the Federal Territories.
However, Congress expressly extended the entire Constitution into
all federal Territories in 1873 -- even future federal Territories:
http://www.supremelaw.org/stat/18/18stat333.gif (Sec. 1891)
Puerto Rico is mentioned repeatedly in the Code of Federal Regulations
for Title 27 here:
"The Cooper File" nails the genealogy in some detail here:
http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/cooper/cooper.htm ("flick of the pen")
(no rebuttal(s) from any opposing party(s))
Likewise, no rebuttal(s) to our classic 31Q&A here:
This UNCLASSIFIED document says much the same thing:
This winning brief (which I wrote on my own behalf),
documents 2 Regulations for Title 31, which Clinton
ordered to be removed from all Federal Depository Libraries:
(names were changed to protect family privacy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/31cfr512.htm#secretary (2 "Secretaries" !!)
And, this standing decision is classic for revealing a
second "Secretary of the Treasury" in Puerto Rico:
Our clients now successfully confront the IRS for violating 31 U.S.C. 333,
because IRS cannot produce any authority(s) to show "Department of the Treasury"
on ANY of their written correspondence or pre-printed forms e.g. Form 1040!!
Their failure to produce authority then implicates them in FELONY MAIL FRAUD (at least):
18 U.S.C. 1341 (also one of numerous RICO "predicate acts")
This COMPLAINT to dismantle the IRS was obstructed:
The "obstructor" was Dean D. Pregerson, described in detail here
by the late Gary Wean, former LAPD Detective:
Likewise, this APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION was also obstructed --
more than once:
ALL EVIDENCE ABOVE IS EXTREMELY INCRIMINATING!!
Moreover, there is no liability STATUTE for taxes imposed by IRC subtitle A:
http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/2amjur2d.htm ( see Commissioner v. Acker !! )
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/nad06.htm ( See Item (7) )
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)
All Rights Reserved without PrejudiceOn Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Mike Harris <harrists1@...> wrote:The bad news in that story, (although the story itself is a good development) is that the IRS comissioner is "Schulman" if as I suspect a member of the tribe, who will avoid revoking the tax exempt status of AI-P-A-C.Mike