Re: [CCCC-USA] Private Attorney General in USA acknowledges U.S. Senator David Vitter for speaking out against Obama's eligibility
No, they did not! The Third Circuit is HEAVILY infiltrated with impostors.> "we rejected almost identical claims in Berg"
See all "NAD" links to missing and/or defective credentials here --
which investigated all U.S. Courts of Appeal:
The OATH OF OFFICE is an absolute requirement imposed
by Article VI, Section 3 in the U.S. Constitution, and various
implementing Acts of Congress e.g. 5 U.S.C. 3331, 28 U.S.C. 453:
Without taking the oath prescribed by law,
one cannot become a judge either de jure or de facto, and
such an individual is without authority to act and
his acts as such are void until he has taken the prescribed oath.
[French v. State, 572 S.W.2d 934]
[Brown v. State, 238 S.W.2d 787]Berg has standing under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and 1985:Sincerely yours,
Wadleigh v. Newhall; Gillespie v. Civiletti.
The United States has standing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1345.
See also the evidence,and SUBPOENA, to which Obama and his Counsel fell silent here,
activating legal estoppel:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/third.circuit/nad02.htm ("son of the soil")
The multiple frauds arising from tampering with the Qualifications Clauses
are explained in detail here:
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)All Rights Reserved without Prejudice