Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.


Expand Messages
  • Luis Ewing
    From Luis Ewing at or or or or
    Message 1 of 2 , Mar 1, 2010
      From Luis Ewing at <rcwcodebuster (at) comcast.net> or <rcwcodebuster (at) yahoo.com> or <rcwcodebuster (at) gmail.com> or <rcwcodebuster (at) aol.com> or <rcwcodebuster (at) hotmail.com> or <luis (at) luisewing.com> or telephone: (253) 226-3741

      (Note: Please copy and paste all 5 of my e-mail addresses listed above & below and ADD them to your CONTACTS FOLDER.)

      I have 5 different e-mail addresses under <rcwcodebuster @ the following 5 internet providers:

      a.) comcast.net>
      b.) yahoo.com>
      c.) gmail.com>
      d.) hotmail.com>
      e.) aol.com>

      New Web Sites: <www.luisewing.com> or <www.ultimateusers.com>

      GODS LAW as written in the 1599 GENEVA BIBLE at <http://www.americanvision.com/bibles.aspx> says:

      "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast refused knowledge, I will also refuse thee that thou shall be no Priest to me: and seeing thou hast forgotten the Law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." Hosea 4:6

      "I say again, Let no man think that I am foolish, or else take me even as a fool, that I also may boast myself a little." 2 Corinthians 11:16

      "That I speak, I speak it not after the Lord: but as it were foolishly, in this my great boasting." 2 Corinthians 11:17

      "The paths of man are directed by the Lord: for he loveth his way." Psalm 37:23

      "Then answered he, and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed, is the son of man." Mathew 13:37

      "Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your father which is in heaven." Mathew 5:16

      "That ye may be blameless, and pure, and the sons of God without rebuke in the midst of a naughty and crooked nation, among whom ye shine as lights in the world." Phillipians 2:15

      "But he that doeth truth, cometh to the light, that his deeds might be made manifest, that they are wrought according to God." John 3:21

      "Then Peter and the Apostles answered, and said, We ought rather to obey God than men." Acts, 5:29

      "Draw near to God, and he will draw near to you. Cleanse your hands, ye sinners, and purge your hearts, ye double minded." James 5:8

      "No servant can serve two masters: for either he shall hate the one, and love the other: or else he shall lean to the one, and despise the other, Ye cannot serve God and riches." Luke 16:13

      "Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the ordinances of the world, why, as though ye lived in the world, are ye burdened with traditions?" Colossians 2:20

      "As, Touch not, Taste not, Handle not." Colossians 2:21

      "Which all perish with the using, and are after the commandments and doctrines of men." Colossians 2:22

      "And putting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, he even took it out of the way, and fastened it upon the cross, . . ." Colossians 2: 14.

      "That we henceforth be no more children, wavering and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the deceit of men, and with crafttiness, whereby they lay in wait to deceive." Ephesians, 4:14

      "And we know, that the Law is good, if a man use it lawfully." Timothy, 1:8

      "Think not that I am come to destroy the Law, or the Prophets. I am not come to destroy them, but to fulfill them." Mathews 5:17.


      From: "billnmarsh@..." <billnmarsh@...>
      To: No-Drivers-License@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: [No-Drivers-License] Luis Ewing
      Date: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 9:28:31 AM [View Source]

      Luis Ewing has a lot to offer this particular forum.

      He offers pearls of wisdom from his wealth of experience that few can match.

      The flyers are in keeping with the mission statement of this forum.
      Ewing, unlike some, is not verbally abusive.

      A man is worth his keep and I don't find it offensive for him to offer his services for pay when I know for a fact that he wins.

      We need more who walk the walk and don't just talk the talk.

      Bill and Marsh in Arizona


      From: "EL_henderson" <el_henderson@...>
      To: <rcwcodebuster@...>
      Subject: California
      Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:03:30 +0000

      Greetings Sir
      This past week I was in California. Los Angeles conducts road block ambushes there I found myself with only my expired 2004 Washington "CDL" and your NO LICENSE REQUIRED IN WASHINGTON FLYER. Mind you they were impounding cars on the spot, reminiscent of a Mexican border crossing. So when I handed it to him his eyes lit up and he said EXPIRED. I said read the flier.
      He said this is California and you need to have a "CDL" here. I looked at him and said So, what you wanna do? Do you want me to turn right from the impound lot or... HE SAID "NO KEEP STRAIGHT!" I WAS FREE TO GOOOOO.........
      a friend of Checkmate & Braun.
      Thank YOU!


      From: Michael Roebuck <roebuck4469@...>
      To: rcwcodebuster@...

      Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 04:47:33 +0000


      I should have written a lot sooner to tell you that I used the information you gave over the radio when talking with Fredrick Earl on KZFR in Chico. I received a BS "click it" ticket, and pled not guilty, asking the judge for a written decision. I cited that the officer had no probable cause and a couple of the supreme court decisions you mentioned (e.g. Terry vs. Ohio). I also quoted California Vehicle Code Section to let the judge know that he was trying to charge me way too much for the fine. I received a letter back about a month later, case dismissed. Also, the judge was trying to charge me $100 for an illegal ticket which CVC states he could only fine $35. Thank you so much for the information.


      From: Patrick Kerslake <kerscrew@...>
      To: rcwcodebuster@..., rcwcodebuster@..., rcwcodebuster@...

      Subject: click-it-ticket
      Date: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 10:49:45 PM

      Dear Luis,

      A friend of mine recently contacted you and said she had great luck using the information you gave her when she went and faced the court system.

      Patrick Kerslake

      From: "JOE EMMETT" <joe_516@...>
      To: <luis@...>
      Date: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 8:58:30 PM [View Source]

      How much and when, I think Luis Ewing would be much better than Marc Stevens last seminar, Marc seemed to give no real seminar because he didn't want them to tape him(just an opinion).


      From: "JOE EMMETT" <joe_516@...>
      To: <rcwcodebuster@...>
      Subject: Re: your mail
      Date: Sunday, January 01, 2006 5:29:11 AM [View Source]

      When Stevens had a seminar in Austin someone had all this recording and film equipment in the rear of the room. Stevens didn't like the idea. He talked with the people who wanted to record the proceedings in private. He came back and the filmers prevailed. They recorded but the thing every one wanted to talk about, how to use his questions he did not go over for about 5 minutes. He mainly just Bsd the time away. It was like his book talks about a good or service being provided at the barrel of a gun. They seemed to have the gun at his head and he just provided a non service, he also wasn't selling his own books but rbns copys of his books. Perhaps I'm delusional but that's what I saw.


      From: "sales--wave tech" <sales@...>
      To: <rcwcodebuster@...>

      Subject: RE: Luis Ewing Seminars & FREE FLYERS! -- PLEASE FORWARD TO ALL YOUR FRIENDS!

      Date: Friday, January 27, 2006 12:07:48 AM [View Source]

      Hey Luis:

      Whenever some people pay me I'll chip in on the state flyers!

      We've got a small group started here in Ohio near Cincy. Would love to have you come in…but need more people first.

      I notice the state flyers are somewhat similar as most states are similar…but OHIO is one Nazi state for police and a little different on the law from other states. Just an observation studying your material. . None…absolutely none of the `patriot-for-plunder" stuff has worked here. Between a friend and I we've tried a lot of it….so I know this is one mother of a state. YAH KNOW MARC STEVENS? A FRIEND TRIED HIS STUFF AND WAS JUST "MOVED RIGHT ALONG"…ENDING UP WITH 30 DAYS FOR DRIVING W/O PLASTIC. WHAT DO YOU THINK OF HIS STUFF? I THINK OF IT AS "JUST A DELAY" AND THE JUDGES HERE VIEW IT AS JUST MORE PATRIOT DRIBBLE.


      From: "Michael James Anthony" <michaeljamesanthony@...>
      To: rcwcodebuster@...
      Subject: About updates and a testimonial 4 U
      Date: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 2:52:30 PM [View Source]


      Thanx for the updates and testimonials and all your hard work and research. Please keep them coming. You are educating people and you ARE making a difference.

      Although I did not have the flyers with me, I was stopped and accused of DWP, and using the information I learned from your flyers, plus some of my own knowledge of the law, not color of law or the revised code, I was NOT arrested!

      My friend riding with me couldn't believe it. Neither did our other friend, whom we were on our way to visit, who had come out to see what all the excitement was about -- three police cruisers with lights flashing, and two guys in a minivan surrounded by six heavily armed paramilitary police officers!

      Our other friend said, "I didn't think you'd be walking away from THAT one!" And I said, "Yeah, well, it's all over so let's smoke some pot!" And, as "ultimate users," we did, lawfully.

      In fact, after considering what the city employee/officer who pulled me over (read "arrested me") had said, and what I had said, the city police "supervisor" who was called to the scene told me, as the other police thugs walked away with scowls on their faces,

      "We usually arrest people who are caught driving without privileges, but we're going to let you go." He was the only one, besides me, who was smiling.

      This is first hand personal proof that you are correct and that your case law is good law when your flyer states that arrest for DWP is at the discretion of the officer and not a foregone conclusion.

      I am also interested, more than ever, in having you host a seminar here in Boise. We need your help and we need the knowledge to defend ourselves in a city that operates one of the most corrupt local governments I have ever seen. They run on RICO! They shoot first and never even bother to ask questions. Then the local paper prints the stock headline from their file:


      Thanx again, look forward to hearing from you,

      and I remain,

      Pro Libertate et Patriae

      "For the Liberty of My Country,"


      Pro Aris et Focis,
      "For Our Altars and Our Hearths,"

      Vive Valeque,

      "Live and Be Well,"
      (Ancient Roman closing of letters)

      Michael James Anthony


      From: "Kay Coates" <fulcircl@...>
      To: <rcwcodebuster@...>
      Subject: Jay Coates - Court Today
      Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 22:02:35 +0000

      Just want you and Kurt to know that the judge dismissed all charges against me. Thank you both for your assistance. I am extremely grateful. My briefcase is full of copies of your flyers which I will distribute to any and all as I travel to the World Peace and Prayer day.

      Jay Coates

      From: Joseph David McGee <josephmcgee@...>
      To: rcwcodebuster@...
      Date: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 5:20:40 PM [View Source]

      Thank you for this information and may Heavenly Father
      smile upon Luis.
      Kindest regards,
      Joseph-David, McGee


      From: "L Smith" <llssffgg@...>
      To: rcwcodebuster@...

      Date: Monday, May 29, 2006 9:56:54 AM [View Source]

      Thanks Luis:

      Having followed your work for some time, I've practiced this for YEARS!
      And... for the most part, have you to thank. Not that I don't have the courage... but courage in the face of a Tax Monger without accurate information made me just another buffoon on the rampage.

      I'm an avid researcher ... and your inspiration has sparked a whole 'other venue in me!



      From: John Wilde <jpwilde@...>
      To: legality-of-drivers-license@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: Re: [legality-of-drivers-license] No_DL Case - they threw it out !!!
      Date: Friday, May 19, 2006 8:53:08 AM Fri, 19 May 2006 15:53:08 +0000

      "John Wilde" <jpwilde@...> said: AH, ANOTHER SOCIALIST EXPOSED!!!

      Tell me son, how much is your liberty worth to you?
      To paraphrase a well known credit card commercial, my liberty, my knowledge, my TIME is: PRICELESS.
      Apparently you don't believe that my freedom time and energy has any value.
      Doesn't work that way.
      You sound like my little sister when I was growing up.
      After I bought something with my own money and wouldn't let her play with it because I knew she would break it.
      She would run to my mother and whine: "Mommy Johnny won't share his things".
      You ought to be ashamed of yourself.
      As I said, I will discuss general concepts and principles on this and any other list.
      However, if you want specific help, if you want the details, and I am more than willing to provide that assistance, it's gonna cost you a fair price.
      If you aren't prepared to pay that price for my knowledge, then I guess you're going to have to spend the 23 years of self-study and research just as I have done.
      However, let me give you a small clue.
      Given what I know is going on in the bowels of gummint, you don't have 23 years to do the studying I have done.
      Life's a bitch. GET OVER IT!!!
      But don't come to this list and whine that "Johnny won't share" [or that Paul Andrew Mitchell and Luis Ewing won't give you a complete CD copy of their "hard-drive's" and their monitor's and printer's for FREE.]


      John Wilde


      From: Harry James at popsey11@...
      To: No-Drivers-License@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 10:22 AM
      Subject: RE: [No-Drivers-License] Luis Ewing controversy
      When I commence to work for someone they usually ask me how much it will cost them. I reply to them that freely I have received and freely I give.
      HOWEVER, I also remind them that the laborer is WORTHY of his hire and it is they not me who is responsible to determine my WORTH in the performance of my work for them.
      If they ask me how they will be able to determine my worth I simply tell them to get a price from someone else to use as a guideline. I then will share with them what others have given me for similar work but tell them that I am willing to let it up to them determine my worth and set my pay because I believe them to be fair and honest. Set the guy's character evaluation high and see if he can reach it.
      Now if they clearly cheat me then shame on them for doing so. However, they will never get another chance to cheat me for to allow them to do so would be shame on me. A man that clearly gives a man less than he is worth, unless unable to do so, is not worthy of my time.
      To date I have never been disappointed in what I have received working in this manner and many times I receive more than what others have given me for similar work done in the past.
      When asked about my qualifications to do the work I simply direct them to other I have worked for. I never speak a word in self evaluation but rather let that up to other I have worked for. I am sometimes told that I come highly recommended in my area of work which is worth more to me that the money. To be well spoken of does have value since it gives you pleasure [not pride] in a job well done.
      In time I am sure I will fall victim to someone [bad apple] who is willing to pay me less than I am worth by anyones standard but overall I am certain that I will have enough to meet my needs.
      This method may not be for everyone but it works for me.


      From: Advancepum@...
      To: citizensoftheUSofA@yahoogroups.com

      Subject: Re: [citizensoftheUSofA] OBJECTION TO: [People B4 Lawyers] ATTENTION ALL FREE...

      Date: Sunday, May 21, 2006 1:40:32 PM [View Source]

      This list is for all of us. while it also urks me that some require funds to help in legal situations, I am retired and require no funds for my time any more. therefore I don't charge for my help. If I were not drawing my retirement checks and funds from my retirement accounts I would likely need to charge for my time too. Therefore if you need help from someone that needs to keep his/her nose above the water you must pay for it. IF YOU CAN'T PAY A REASONABLE FEE FOR IT THEN GO TO THOSE THAT DON'T CHARGE FOR THE SERVICE.

      [Note from Luis Ewing: The above reader Paul at: <Advancepum@...> demonstrated the most common sense. If you don't want to hire Paul Andrew Mitchell or Luis Ewing to help you or can't afford them, then go to those that don't charge for the service. If you don't have MONEY, go get a PUBLIC DEFENDER and see what kind of JUSTUS you will get!!!! IT'S THAT SIMPLE!] (Your time is better spent reading my FREE FLYERS and learning something instead of worrying about what Paul Andrew Mitchell, Lawyer Dude, Frederick Graves of Jurisdictionary or Luis Ewing does for a living!)

      From: "paradoxmagnus" <paradoxmagnus@...>
      To: legality-of-drivers-license@yahoogroups.com

      Subject: [legality-of-drivers-license] Re: No_DL Case - they threw it out !!!

      Date: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 12:23:04 PM [View Source]

      Don't BITCH about WHAT is given to you.

      Take the information that is FREELY shared and LEARN from it.

      The simple FACT is that if someone has SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE that is of VALUE to you, you are going to have to PAY for it ONE WAY or another in TIME, ENERGY and/or MONEY.

      Most likely the PRICE will be ALL of the ABOVE.

      Patrick in California

      "Knowledge will forever govern ignorance, and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives."--James Madison


      From: "mrchaos007" <mrchaos007@...>
      To: <Commercial_Redemption@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 12:22 PM
      Subject: Re: [Commercial_Redemption] seatbelt ticket in NC |
      Oh please, it is valuable info he is giving away free, Yes he is selling something too, but if the real law gets out there and informs a lot more people that is an overriding good!!!!
      People are so used to being lied to by the government, they are so dumbed down they have no idea, that insurance is BS, that cannibus law are bogus.
      Help the info flow, DO NOT IMPEED,
      Stop whining and see the overwhelming good!

      From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
      To: PeopleBeforeLawyers@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: [citizensoftheUSofA] OBJECTION TO: [People B4 Lawyers] ATTENTION ALL FREELOADERS ...
      Date: Sunday, May 21, 2006 1:24:41 PM [View Source]

      You apparently insist upon posting under the misconception that this list is a for-profit enterprise.

      Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...> wrote:



      If you think I'm going to review your bad legal work for free,
      you're crazy and also in violation of the Thirteenth Amendment.


      A word to the wise is sufficient.

      The idiots of this world won't get it, no matter how many times I repeat myself, so I won't.


      "There is a clear distinction between "profit" and "wages" or compensation for labor. Compensation for labor cannot be regarded as profit within the meaning of the law." Oliver v. Halstead, 196 Va. 992; 86 S.E. 2d 858.

      "The workman is worthy of his hire." The Holy Bible

      Your ignorance of this Law is no excuse!!!

      The punishment for false teachers . . . [such as PeopleBeforeLawyers@yahoogroups.com or No-Drivers-License@yahoogroups.com] is described in the Book of Jude, in the New Testament. (Emphasis added).

      Shame on you!

      Why would anyone wish to participate on such a list, . . . [such as PeopleBeforeLawyers@yahoogroups.com or No-Drivers-License@yahoogroups.com] if such fundamental errors are being repeated frequently???



      Sincerely yours,
      /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
      Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
      Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)

      All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


      From: Roger Rancourt
      Sent: Aug 24, 2007 10:43 PM
      To: jacklancaster@...


      I just want to thank indirectly, Mr. Luis Ewing for the brilliant advice he gave out regarding territorial courts & LAWS & the RATIFIED LAW as commissioned by Congress

      The incredible advice he gave or sent out, allowed Jeff Fisher and his legal defender to win the case & be released from Jail with most of the charges dropped.


      From : <Djones3220@...>
      Sent : Wednesday, February 25, 2004 12:42 PM
      To : rcwcodebuster@...
      Subject : Thanks, Luis

      The article on discharging debt is excellent. I am grateful for your integrity.

      Keep the good stuff coming.

      May God bless you.

      Don Jones

      From : <SharonAliveNWell@...>
      Sent : Friday, February 20, 2004 12:27 PM
      To : rcwcodebuster@...

      Wow. What a concept. Work and pay your bills? As insane as that probably
      sounds to some people, I agree. Thank you, Luis

      From : Nancy English <englishvinal@...>
      Sent : Wednesday, February 18, 2004 1:39 PM
      To : liveinjoy@...
      CC : rcwcodebuster@...
      Subject : Something for Nothing

      I suddenly began to like and respect Luis Ewing......I agree agree agree!

      When "M" (you know who I am in reference to), INSISTED, and even got mad at me for refusing to do the "credit card discharge" deal using John Gilia's methods, ("M" even brought me over the big text books to learn how to do this), even when he got so aggravated at me for refusing, I stood my ground.

      I told him "I got the money and/or the 'stuff' and I used it, I shipped my household goods to Nicaragua in a big shipping container and used the credit card to accomplish it, I believe I OWE the money because I 'spent" the money, and I am going to pay it.

      And I did, all $30,000.00of it!. It took me over 2 years to get it all paid and I did that working for Wayne Bentson and traveling all over the states attending face to face confrontations with the IRS. ((Not nice fun work, let me tell you!))

      I am glad that I did it the way I did. Other people who did the Gilha process are now in deep do-do......because they took 'M's' insistant advice and implemented this process. They don't even answer their phones any more because the CC companies and the collections companies never let it stop ringing.

      Glad that I am where I am and they are the ones suffering the indignities heaped upon them because of their desire to "get something for nothing"... and not me. (Nothing like being self satisfied is there? Smile)


      From : <FeelGood3666@...>
      Sent : Monday, February 23, 2004 7:24 AM
      To : rcwcodebuster@...
      Subject : Helping the Little Guy?


      You and I have never met or e-mailed but I just read your response to someone regarding a person called Barton Bhutz and his so-called discharge method and several of your remarks struck a sympathetic chord in me - in particular, your comments about having nothing for the free lunch seekers AND wanting to help the little guy.

      I, too, have studied these matters for many years - probably more on the income tax question than on the legal principles surrounding the creation of money and debt - and my conclusion is that we are all little guys when it comes to being able to do battle with the governmental and commercial interests that make the rules in the games we are forced to play.

      In general, I don't think any self-respecting little guy is looking to get something for nothing (notwithstanding the overwhelmingly contrary evidence presented by the exploding casino industry in the US) - I think the little guy would be happy to know that he's on a level playing field. Sadly, what the little guy doesn't understand (although he may intuitively feel it) is that the "house odds" in the tax, banking, credit and money/debt creation arena are just about as badly stacked against him as the odds in any casino - there is no level playing field for the little guy.

      I was born and remain a little guy from a working class family but I had the good fortune to get a good education that enabled me to go into a profession where I thought I could do some good. Even at that young age, though, I knew the system was seriously flawed but what I was not prepared for was the massive size of the con job we have fallen prey to. Once you've gotten close enough to the medical or legal profession - if you are honest with yourself - then you can see the extent to which the corruption infects the entire system.

      I'm not saying that doctors and lawyers are corrupt people - I think that is a mistake that many people make. I believe that most who entered those professions did so with the best of intentions but have been largely blinded to the systemic flaws - and the privileged positions which this culture accords them keeps them from seeing those flaws. After all, the doctors and lawyers have some of the cushiest seats on the bus, fully equipped with so many comforts and distractions that they remain oblivious to the fact that the bus is headed for the cliffs. Today's doctors and lawyers are the equivalent of the house slaves of the 1800's - or the Trustees in the prison system. And relative to the rest of the little guys their positions are cushy enough that they can almost forget that they also sleep behind bars at night.

      Well, enough blather. I'll get off my soap box. I just thought I'd drop you a note to say hello because this "outside the box" thinking can be a lonely business sometimes and its good to know there are others out there.

      Drop a line if you get the chance and let me know how things are gooing in the world of "tilting at windmills".

      Best regards,


      From : Percy D. Wiley <pdwiley@...>
      Sent : Friday, February 20, 2004 12:02 PM
      To : "Luis Ewing" <rcwcodebuster@...>

      Mr. Ewing's message is clear and unambiguous.
      The 'Pretenders' who would have you believe they can sell you schemes to discharge your debts are scamming you.

      From : Dr Benham <drbenham@...>
      Reply-To : "Dr Benham" <dan@...>
      Sent : Sunday, February 29, 2004 1:06 PM
      To : "Luis Ewing" <rcwcodebuster@...>

      I am glad you folks are now like myself, DEAD AGAINST those bogus DEBTS.

      I am still awaiting Richard to make contact with me re coming on one of our calls to amplify what he is doing.

      Thanks for the e-mails and I hope you are getting ours too.

      Just finished in Tampa Fl workshop and got at least 30 more educated in the only true ways UCC can work and again you are right and Barton is off.


      From : <lisamarie054@...>
      Sent : Wednesday, March 3, 2004 8:46 AM
      To : "Luis Ewing" <rcwcodebuster@...>
      Subject : Re: Re: BOE & BONDS

      Hi, Luis... You know I agree with you in some of your thoughts. I got taken by one of these so called patriots for 12,000 dollars and lost my house and my credit. I understand what you are saying, but I think people take a lot of this information and use it to there advantage (GAIN) that is not what it is all about. Every situation is different. I know that there is NO MONEY, but in the same sense everyone needs MONEY. I don't like the fact that when ever you OWE something it comes in all caps that is not your god given name. Why does it have to be about the corporation name? Why do they require your SSN on everything, why do they have to do a credit check for insurance? Do you like the control? I don't mind some of it but I don't think they should be able to control everything.
      If the STRAWMAN doesn't exist then how can you file a UCC with taking priority
      claim, your going to tell me for revenue. I agree with you as far as ELIMINATION, I don't agree with that either. I like to settle things without a fight. Everyone has there own option and I respect yours, but in the same sense, I think people should know about what is going on and how it is working. What they do with there information is there business. They are grown and make there own decisions. Right! It was really nice talking to you.
      Keep helping people and have a great day.


      From : donald fleming <djdax17@...>
      Sent : Friday, February 27, 2004 7:44 PM
      To : rcwcodebuster@...
      Subject : RE: The past

      Greetings! I couldn't have said it any better. I have been complaining about what has occurred and how many of the false patriots have misled many persons and have not been making any efforts to educate the masses, but are more concerned with their ego trip(s).

      Now I am associating with people that are eager to learn and assignments are given out at each meeting and we are required to bring the results to the following meeting. Finally!

      After almost 30 years of intensive and extensive research while the rest have fallen by the wayside, so to speak, I am fortunate to meet and know persons that are willing to fight the system.

      I always use as my guidelines the sacrifices that the Founding Fathers made for us and what we must do to maintain what they put forth!

      Keep up your good work!


      From : D R <deerudd@...>
      Sent : Friday, February 27, 2004 6:34 PM
      To : rcwcodebuster@...

      Dear Mr. Ewing, I can't tell you how much I appreciate your sending me this article. I am in deep trouble with the IRS (they have me in district court for 2 cases) and I just filed in tax court to try to keep them off my back for a while longer.

      I was close to using something like talked about in the article - but had hesitated because there seemed to be something not right about it.


      Mark <m.schrader1@...>
      Sent : Saturday, February 28, 2004 5:42 PM
      To : <rcwcodebuster@...>
      Subject : Luis, are you familiar with Clyde Hyde? He also wins traffic court cases & thinks the Bill of Exchanges are total garbage!

      You readers would benefit by joining Clydes forums.
      As he knows how to stop the IRS from moving against you.

      Hope this helps,

      From : Lance <handyman4nv@...>
      Sent : Friday, February 27, 2004 10:45 AM
      To : Luis Ewing <rcwcodebuster@...>

      Thank you for your response about my friend and his situation with respect to his problems, I have not talked to him yet but soon.
      I know Richard and he is a fine man. I have his materials and have used them and prevailed. I still have a lot of studying to do and a lot to learn. I have been to jail myself on one occasion and had my car towed on another. I have tried different approaches, but I agree with you that the best way to beat them is with their own materials. I would like to learn more from you, where do you teach most of the time, what is the length of time, and how many subjects do you cover?
      What is the medium of exchange you desire and how much?



      From : Chuck F. Conces <chuckconces@...>
      Sent : Saturday, February 28, 2004 6:24 AM
      To : rcwcodebuster@...

      Dear Luis:
      I agree with most of your analysis but I am unwilling to spend much time on it since the UCC doesn't affect my work.
      I'm glad someone is out there refuting the UCC non-sense.

      We have started forming Lawmen groups around the Country.
      Let me know if you wish to form or join a group and I will start a group in your area.
      Give your name and the nearest city and state.
      Each group can decide meeting times and frequency and choose their own coordinators.
      The goals will be specific in nature.
      Visit my web site at

      God Bless, Chuck Conces

      From : Ron Loeber <ron@...>
      Sent : Friday, February 27, 2004 3:55 PM
      To : "Luis Ewing" <rcwcodebuster@...>


      I don't know who you are or how you got my address, but I was happy and sad to read your email. Happy because of what you said about the people selling Silver Bullets. I have friends who have been trying the Redemption stuff and just get into deeper shit, yet they still believe they will prevail in the end.
      I was saddened to read that Dan Meador is deceased. It came as a surprise to me. Was wondering why I haven't received e-mails from him for some time.
      One of the things I sent Dan was a copy of Slavery, American Style. It was written by my mentor. It is written in the form of a memorandum of law and sets forth just about everything one should know about the so-called income tax in a manner that the average 8th grader can understand. It just cuts through the bullshit. I would be happy to send you a complimentary copy if you send me your postal address.
      I have been fighting traffic tickets for a long time. Win a few... lose a few. Anything you can provide me on the subject would be appreciated.

      Ron Loeber, JAILer-In-Chief
      PO Box 193
      Knox, NY 12107


      From : <VeritasRadio@...>
      Sent : Monday, March 8, 2004 8:31 AM
      To : rcwcodebuster@...
      Subject : Personal Endorsement of Luis Ewing...

      "If I ever need legal counsel or representation in court,
      this is the man I'll call !"
      ~ Harvey Wharfield, Host, VERITAS Radio

      V E R I T A S Radio
      Streaming on the web Thursdays @ 3:00 PM Eastern
      at... http://www.tiger1590.com
      Shows archived at... http://VeritasRadio.com

      From : <Redrockbob7@...>
      Sent : Sunday, February 29, 2004 1:43 AM
      To : rcwcodebuster@...

      Yes, it is important that there are skilled people that understand the codes of government. It is equally important to repair our government to a point that a man of common understanding can handle his affairs effectively in courts of law with equal and fair due process of law.
      The point is that no individual or government is above the law of the people, which is: "You may do as your will dictates as long as you do not cause a damage, an obvious danger or violate the rights of another." THIS IS THE LAW OF THE PEOPLE THAT IS THE BEDROCK OF ALL JUSTICE AND LAW.
      It is impossible to imagine a situation where an individual could be lawfully punished if he did not violate this basic maxim of law.
      When the violation of maxims of law cease to be violated, than there is the highest degree of justice.
      Justice is the object of law. Justice is suppose to be why law was created and enforced.
      Since the Courts have adopted a practice of forcing obligations with impunity, the object is to cause the courts to adopt policies that recognize the importance of no party violating maxims of law with impunity.
      This can be done partially by private discovery processes that force answers or acquiescence. (Private administrative processes)
      Adhering to the basic principles of lawful process and maxims of law is the foundation of strength that must prevail in all courts of competent jurisdictions.
      If anyone is allowed to violate maxims of law in a court proceeding, than that is the immediate problem that requires immediate investigation and attention into the ignorant or fraudulent practices of the incompetent court employee.
      If we accept the behavior of judges that are blatantly witnessing the evidence of blatant violations of maxims of law, than we are accepting a system that is not working properly.
      The people have allowed the practice to statutory oppression to become accepted practice in our present society. Therefor, because they have done it for so many years, everyone believes they are doing the right thing. Except for those that know and are engaged in purposeful fraud.
      Whenever you are involved in a legal battle in the courts, you must always insist that the maxims of law are paramount laws above all else. Why?? Because you cannot have justice when maxims of law are being violated.
      List the maxims of law that pertain to your case, as the laws of your case.
      A pro-se litigant is not required to know and understand all of the rules and regulations that govern the professional conduct of attorney's, which is: All of the written rules.
      If a court fails to accept your lawful evidence because you are not skilled as and attorney, than the court has violated your lawful rights to due process of law with their prejudice and conflict of political interests. A pro-se litigant has only the obligation to act in a manner prudent of a reasonably intelligent common individual.
      All written law is for use by government. A written law should never lawfully affect you unless the government has gained jurisdiction (or claim) against you by conviction of a crime or by a consensual contract. Anything more is just a presumption of law, which is always rebuttable.
      The people are only lawfully subject to the law of the people, which is: "You may do as your will dictates as long as you do not cause a damage, an obvious danger or violate the rights of another."
      REMEMBER: A legislative law could never lawfully violated maxims of law or it is of course , void!!
      As Patrick Henry predicted, we have fallen into judicial tyranny. There is no current checks and balance for the Judiciary. It is our job to develop a lawful system that forces the Judges to obey the law or become subject to public scrutiny.
      The question is: Forcing Judges to obey law or reap the consequences.
      If you can document enough evidence in your court papers to make a valid claim against a violating Judge, a civil rights action should be brought in an effort to expose the unlawful actions and behavior of an incompetent Judge. The same should be done to any government employee that is a menace to honest and lawful government.
      I am sure that after a few bad Judges have been kicked of the bench or punished, other Judges will abide by the law.
      The object is to establish all evidence into the record and pursue legal action in front of a fully informed jury.
      I think you will find settlement long before a trial. Which still ends up for the better.

      You would think there would have to be enough good people working in government that would be amenably to repairing the government into compliance of all maxims of law.

      By law, no one has the right to force another obligation upon another with impunity.

      The Sovereign Rights Protection Coalition is an organization that is dedicated to establishing case law that causes the government to function within the guidelines of maxims of law.
      S.R.P.C. Needs the volunteer services of people who can build webs site that will have the full record and investigations of all courts actions.
      S.R.P.C. Needs help to built an organization that runs off of donations from the people as members of S.R.P.C.
      The object is to procure enough funds for filing fees and expenses.
      The plan is in place to repair the entire system, all we need is the support of real patriotic people. People that are patriotic to causing society to function as justly and fairly as possible.
      Nobody is going to do it for us. It is up to us.
      COME ON!!! Lets see how many great minds we can find out there.
      (People that still believe in "fringe on the flag" and "Redemption", need not apply.)
      With concerns of deepest urgency

      Bob Hart 2-28-04 redrockbob7@...
      Please send this to all.

      From : justice <justice@...>
      Sent : Saturday, February 28, 2004 4:40 PM
      To : kgod999 <kgod999@...>
      Subject : [Legs] Re: drivers license:respond

      Dear Sir,
      I did not see that e-mail and I must inform you I am not an advocate of using UCC forms, Redemption and Ex-Patriation programs and other wild eyed speculative and possibly dishonest or patridiot for profit disinformation schemes that are born of the system's equity, admiralty, or "law" to ensnare you. Sorry if the saddle must be blown from under you to get your attention as to the truth about your question and the simplicity of the answer to it.
      Yes! I do locomote (travel) without permission of the "government," no license, not a person, or resident of the forum State of WA, OR, ID, MT, MO, or CA or any of the other federal States. I am not the resident operator they have jurisdiction over in intra or inter state commerce.
      In most states it is not a crime in most instances but not all to drive on the public roadways with out a drivers license. I am most familiar with Washington, but I drive in many other states as well under equal protection of the law as defined by the Constitution for the United States of America, A.D. 1787, A.D. 1789, having more Articles added in A.D. 1791 and back to Section one of the Fourth Article reached through Article One Section Two of the second and phony Constitution of The
      State of Washington from the July 4th phony convention constitution of 1889.
      To date I have never been convicted of a crime or infraction in any state forum and still fighting several NVOL charges, over the years having all others dismissed one way or the other and the latest bail jumping charge dismissed stemming from a previous failure to appear warrant.
      I've been fighting traffic citations and related other trumped up charges for 35 years (State and Federal) and I can't say it gets any easier to stop the evil rats when in fact they learn more insidious ways to subvert the law and rules and it has become much harder every time I and my counsel enter the court to put down the evil. It a war of a kind with people pitted against the State, the judge and his/her friend the prosecutor. I do not advise any one to go it alone and if you do not have super counsel consider entering their licensing agreements. Of course my super counsel is the one and only Jesus the Christ my Father in Heaven and Earth. Stand up for what is right no matter how wrong and vischous they get with you, of course remember it is not between you and them, it is between them and God and they will suffer the consequence in the end.
      You will be persecuted for being politically different when you act it out and they live the excuse that ignorance of their law is no excuse not to go to jail or pay the fines when they think you violate their law or rules.
      I do not charge money or fees for my counsel, but the Church of Jesus the Christ who I am Pastor/Parson for asks donations if possible when counseling those in need. God knows it is expensive to keep up a Congregation and Church and Alms coming in for the poor. If you are a
      government agent from the evil side and are operating for entrapment, please pay double after disclosing or not and go straight to Hell.
      Blessing to God's and curses to the devil's.

      Sincerely, lloyd


      From : Art Northrup, Jr. <art_njr@...>
      Sent : Saturday, February 28, 2004 8:40 AM
      To : "Luis Ewing" <rcwcodebuster@...>

      Just wanted to drop you a note - I don't know how I ended up on your mailing list, but I'm glad I did.
      The only person mentioned below whom I know is Pat Lynch, who is one very sharp fella & who taught me how to de-code the IMF. I'm pretty good @ it, but nowhere near as good as Pat & when I need help with one, that's who I call. He's also just a plain nice guy.

      Richard Cornforth I've heard of, but have never met or corresponded with. People who have mentioned his name seem to think highly of him though.

      Barton Buhtz I've heard too & after seeing claims of all the cases he's supposedly won, I asked him to give me the case # of even one & I also issued a direct & succinct challenge to him to prove any of his UCC claims. All I got back was an angry response which went around in circles & didn't address either issue.

      I don't have the time or $$$ to go thru every courthouse in the country looking for anything he's filed & I certainly am not going to buy anything from him - that's what he wanted me to do - buy a package. I might have been born @ night, but it wasn't last night.

      Don't know Eddie Kahn either, but I've heard of him too & it wasn't good. Suffice it to say that the people who spoke of him referred to him as "Eddie Con".

      I'm kinda surprised that the UCC Redemption & "Strawman" deals are still flying around & that people are still paying for that stuff. Anybody can look the UCC up - it's in their State statutes for heaven's sake. But, as pointed out, it's not a federal statute & it never has been. I rarely need to use it for anything & I don't know its origin, just that, although not by choice, all the States incorporated it into their Codes.

      I have heard the theories behind the Birth Certificate deal & somewhere I actually have a copy of a Birth Certificate filed with the Dept. of Commerce, but what that proves I can't tell you. However, for all practical purposes, every U.S. citizen is collateral for all the $$$ borrowed from the Fed in that it's their future earnings ability which determines what the Fed can get paid.

      Although his name escapes me, several years ago I wrote an article about the Fed in which I used a quote from a U.S. Senator who said basically the same thing. It didn't have anything to do with Birth Certificates, but he was pointing out that while politicians say about certain legislation that the cost of it would be passed on to our children, we're already paying on the debt our grandparents incurred right now.

      Part of what was said about the Fed & FRN's is true - the Fed, which is not a gov't. agency, places an order with the Bureau of Engraving & Printing, which is a gov't. agency, for a certain amount of FRN's & the Fed pays the printing cost of approx. $0.03 - $0.04 per bill, no matter the denomination. Then that "money" is loaned @ face value + interest. That's why we'll never see a truly "cashless society" - the Fed makes too much on "cash" to give up that racket. The Senator I quoted also was saying the same thing.

      Although I'm not an Economist & my Dad passed away in 2002, one of the things he did was teach Post-Grad. Econ. 2 nights/week for 27 years, so I learned a lot from him just by osmosis. The article I wrote is buried somewhere & I need to dig it out, but I wrote it under a penname & my Dad asked me why. I said that since we shared the same name & I didn't have his credentials, I didn't want any mistake I may have made to come back on him & one of the nicest compliments I ever got was when he said he'd be proud to put his name on it because it was right. The article is a bit dated, but when I find it, I'll reproduce it - it was published in a little local paper which didn't last very long & no other paper will touch it with a 10' pole because I refer to the fraud of both the Fed & the IRS - shall we say it's far from being "policially correct."

      Just for your own info, I'm a Mechanical Engineer by schooling, but started doing legal research back in 1991 & it has become a full-time job. I often work with tax attny. Paul Chappell, who Pat Lynch knows, but I mostly work with regular folks who have gotten themselves in a tax mess. It took me a while, but I got out of "the system" about as far as you can get - no driver's license, no SSN, no bank accounts, no credit cards, no property of any kind registered in my name. The vehicles I drive are registered, but not in the State I live in & not in my name.

      In this life, it's not important what you own, just what you control & trusts I know a good deal about. Also, since court rulings all the way back to 1835 determine that all property inherrently belongs to the State, even if a car, house, or whatever is in your name, you don't own it anyway - it's just human pride which likes to say "mine - mine - mine" !! So, the smart thing to do is secure that property the best way you can & some dadgum UCC filing ain't gonna get it! I watched a man lose his house & business over that, but he wouldn't listen - he was sold on "Rightway Law"s stuff.

      Well, gotta get get ready to go to a funeral - friend of mine who earned a Master's Degree in English passed away & he will be sorely missed - not only as a good friend & all around good guy, but also because he was a master of tearing apart the legal mumbo-jumbo "words of art" in "laws" like the Internal Revenue Code & explaing what the section REALLY says - not what someone thinks it says or tells you it says. I'm pretty good @ that too, but not as good as Jim was.

      - Art

      From : John Wilson <jhwilson@...>
      Sent : Thursday, March 4, 2004 4:53 PM
      To : <dbrown@...>, "Luis Ewing" <rcwcodebuster@...>
      CC : <jd.consultants@...>
      Subject : Re: Judicial Power

      Dear Luis,

      Thank you for an excellent email. Having such references is educational because of and in spite of the fact that the material is intended to mislead, ie: all the quotes are based on the false assumption that Congress, or any other Legislature, has the power to grant or take away the Rights of the People when it is the People who created the Legislatures. Talk of putting in place any substitute for Trial by Jury is sinister and should be treated as such.

      Yours sincerely,
      John Wilson.

      From : Patrick Potter <patrickpotter21@...>
      Sent : Tuesday, March 9, 2004 9:38 AM
      To : rcwcodebuster@...
      CC : patrickpotter21@...
      Subject : Know thy Enemy

      I agree Luis ! Know thy enemy !!!!!

      From : (Name requested to be Private.)
      Sent : Friday, March 5, 2004 12:45 AM
      To : "Luis Ewing" <rcwcodebuster@...>
      Subject : Private

      Hi Luis:
      Glad to see that you haven't lost your passion.
      I agree that those who grab onto a portion, as a stick is to a drowning person, may or may not have a demonic purpose. In any case they end up helping shed some light on a portion which may be a piece of the puzzle another person is looking for, to complete their search.
      For those who pay for such information thinking that by itself, is sufficient, will soon find out that such negligence and lack of effort to acquire needed language skills is even more expensive. Even so, the energy they cause the opposing side to expend, wears down the pool.
      If err is to be made, send hoards out on to the field, with or without knowledge, and light will be shed and the noise will be heard.
      Chaos breeds opportunity. Be glad to be challenged as that hones skills and knowledge and therefore power.
      What others say is of no consequence. That they say, is.
      Cheer them on their quest. To save them is to deny them the knowledge.
      Have fun with your quest.

      From : Illenna McClure <ikmcclure@...>
      Sent : Monday, March 29, 2004 8:04 AM
      To : rcwcodebuster@...
      Subject : Need info......I agree re WrongWay Law

      My name is Illenna McClure and I just read your e-mail regarding the good the bad and the ugly of the patriot folks. I completely agree about WrongWay Law......saw that years ago when they were spouting their folklore. I have found where ego's abound run for high ground and WrongWay Law was overwhelmed with ego's.

      I am familiar with a good number of your recommended 'warrior' list and especially Marci Doerr. We have been friends for a few years. We were both in California at the time and now I am in Michigan and she is.... well let's just say "on the road".

      I am interested in knowing more about your data. Do you have a website? The traffic material you mentioned sounds encouraging. Could you please send the documents regarding the traffic stops you offered in the e-mail. Also do you have any seminar plans anywhere in this side of the country?

      I look forward to hearing back from you at your earliest convenience.


      From : David Dawson <allison5010@...>
      Sent : Tuesday, April 27, 2004 7:43 AM
      To : Luis Ewing <rcwcodebuster@...>

      Luis, you may very well be correct in your legal position.

      I know Al and Terri. They are relative beginners, and are doing their best to learn and understand.

      However my agreement is with Terri, you are rude, and the use of 'fucking' etc. does turn people off. You should be more professional and stick to logical rebuttal of bad positions. Your rebuttals are good.

      Just because the ALL CAPS position isn't working does not necessarily mean it is incorrect. If the
      artificial entity government is precluded from interacting with the real people, they cannot even
      admit to it. THEIR system would come down.

      Be direct and uncompromising when you know you are correct, but be professional. Some people actually believe that you are using 'rudeness' to hide some deficit you won't admit. Your attitude is keeping you out of some cities and groups.

      Keep teaching. We need your input.



      From : Tom Kabis <Tkabis@...>
      Sent : Tuesday, April 27, 2004 8:17 AM
      To : 'Luis Ewing' <rcwcodebuster@...>
      Subject : RE: [Cornforthseminar] Fw: RE: Second--Luis Ewing says NO HABEAS CORPUSwill help Al Thompson unless __________?

      Goodness! Dress down an ignorant, but you don't have to hit them over the nose with a newspaper too! Good argument though (sans the vulgar speech). Thanks for the cites...I can use them in my current small claims case.


      From : DriveDoctor <drivedoctor@...>
      Sent : Tuesday, April 27, 2004 7:53 AM
      To : Luis Ewing <rcwcodebuster@...>
      Subject : Purge the Contempt & Al Thompson
      Dear Luis,

      Mark Mayes here.

      I thought you would find it interesting to know that Al Thompson is out of jail after agreeing to comply with the judge's order that Al fill out tax returns. In other words, he offered to purge the contempt, just as you said he would have to do to get out of jail.

      Now, he is looking for a way to show the judge's order is placing an impossibility on him because there isn't an IRS tax return form that applies to his situation. Also, what taxable activity was he involved in that he should be reporting to the IRS, etc. You get the idea.

      He is also looking for a way to challenge the federal court's jurisdiction over him in this matter.

      Mark Mayes


      From : <free@...>
      Sent : Sunday, May 2, 2004 10:19 PM
      To : rcwcodebuster@...

      Dear Luis,

      Thank you very much for the email and information in attachments.
      I am in Reno, Nevada. Is there similar info for this state?
      Please understand that although I have studied much of what is circulating around the patriot community, i find most of it, lacking and potentially harmful to those who would follow their
      advice. I must admit that I am very ignorant in the ways of the court and their procedures and much of what passes as the "law", but I am eager to learn what is the correct and proper way primarily concerning the tax laws as they apply to us.
      So far I am of the opinion that it is the social security application that has most of us tied to the income tax system, although this is not conclusive at this time.

      I will be sure to pass this email to other concerned individuals
      I know in hopes that we can make a difference with information
      that will be effective.

      Again thank you for any direction and assistance you may provide.



      From : Curt <curt@...>
      Sent : Sunday, May 2, 2004 8:34 PM
      To : rcwcodebuster@...
      Subject : read some of your work, on lawworks,

      Hi there,

      I read an extensive piece of yours at lawworks, the yahoo group.
      Thank you, excellent attitude and information. I'm not in Washington, and I do need to study Ill. Law to get up to speed on the rules, but I think that you've got a lot of merit in your words, and I hope that many will learn from what you are teaching.

      I'm writting to point out that you may find the avenue recommended by Clyde at the group mentioned above may be worth your time to study.
      I'm not profitting by suggesting this, but I think that there's real potential in his approach, not only with the IRS, but in other areas as well.

      The one thing that I do not accept as completely true that was in the "rant" of yours that I read, (habeus corpus - al thompson,) was the point that they will not answer your letters: (Please do not be offended by the "Rant" terminology, I LOVE a good, passionate "rant", and yours was excellent and very informative.)

      In the lawworks site, there is a documentary request called an IRS/KGB letter.If you'd like, I'll send you a copy. It is a document request citing the authorities of the FOIA, the common law right to know, and Lwin v INS.
      I know in the Ill. Supreme Court Rules, it states that discovery requests must be responded to. It does not state that there needs to be a Court action for this to be true, or that any court order is necessary..

      I think that all court rules have similar rules within them.
      If they do not respond, they they're going to lose the opportunity to raise any evidence not provided to you on Court or administrative proceedings. Provided that said barring is properly motioned.

      Just thought I ought to mention that, thought you may find that avenue useful.

      Thanks again, all the best,


      From : DMO <utap@...>
      Sent : Sunday, May 2, 2004 8:15 PM
      To : <rcwcodebuster@...>
      Subject : Hello Luis

      Hi Luis,
      I agree with your quote below that I pulled off an email list.
      Please tell me where to go to get your materials-yes I will pay for them!!

      "Most of the Tax Experts out there jumped straight into the higher level Federal Court's without obtaining any knowledge of how the court's work, don't know how to even write a simple legal pleading, don't know court rules, don't know court procedure, don't know when to object or even how to object, don't know when to make an offer of proof or even how to make an offer of proof, and most importantly, they know nothing about the rules of evidence and how to get things into the record over the prosecutor's objection."


      From : <free@...>
      Sent : Sunday, May 2, 2004 10:01 AM
      To : rcwcodebuster@...
      Subject : Information

      Dear Luis,

      My name is John Diakakis and I got your email address from a posting from lawworks which had some nice things to say about you and your progress and the irs.

      Could you please send me information, a wbsite or where you provide information about your strategies?

      Thank you.



      From : jon kaplowitz <jfkap14@...>
      Sent : Saturday, May 1, 2004 12:49 PM
      To : rcwcodebuster@...
      Subject : Do you have a web site?

      Mr Ewing,

      I have read your postings about Al Thompson and Right Way. You are 100% correct. Do you have a web site? I must differ with you about the judges. They are committing perjury in their own courts when they lie into the record. I have seen it happen so often that I know that it is SOP and not an exception.

      Thank you.

      Jon Kaplowitz


      From : eric <erickrieg@...>
      Sent : Monday, October 4, 2004 6:42 PM
      To : <rcwcodebuster@...>
      Subject : Fw: LUIS EWING'S LIST OF BS artists


      I think it is great what you are doing. I understand there have been scams taking advantage of patriots for years. I've tried to warn people about some of those. Basically, many plans that say you need not pay taxes end up leaving you with jail time. I've been trying to warn patriots who get sucked into a phony investment scam that targets patriots. I don't know if you have heard of Dennis Lee - he runs a cult-like fringe group that has been promising people free energy for about 20 years now. I have tried to document his claims at my pages at

      I didn't know if you might have some advice for me (or even publicity help)

      Eric Krieg


      From: lex luxor <lexluxor93@...>
      To: rcwcodebuster@...
      Subject: Re: your free flyers
      Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 16:57:58 +0000

      Hi Luis,
      I commend you on your "FREE" material, so many people who "Charge " outrageous prices for their piles of worthless paper. it is good to see someone actually helping without taking.


      From: <mkjekyll@...> [Add to
      Address Book] [View Source]
      To: <rcwcodebuster@...>,
      Subject: bullshit assault charge
      Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 05:29:12 +0000

      Hi Luis,
      I have a friend in the Portland area with some kind of bullshit domestic assault charge, I told him to call you before arraignment because you are one of the only people that knows what
      the fuck he is doing.
      His name is Peter; not sure if you can help him in Oregon but figure the O.R.S. is pretty much
      word for word same as the R.C.W.
      It's worth a shot any how.



      From: "Mike & Marsha" <mjdx2@...>
      [Add to Address Book]
      To: <rcwcodebuster@...>
      Subject: Re: Debt Discharge
      Date: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 6:02:15 PM [View Source]

      Thanks.........we are on our way to doing that now. Mike
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: rcwcodebuster@...
      To: Mike & Marsha
      Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 7:47 PM
      Subject: Re: Debt Discharge

      From Luis Ewing at (253) 226-3741 or rcwcodebuster@... or rcwcodebu<br/><br/>(Message over 64 KB, truncated)
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.