Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: From Birther Bruce

Expand Messages
  • Supreme Law Firm
    ... From: Westcott2006@aol.com To: Westcott2006@aol.com Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:32:27 EST Subject: From Birther Bruce I cannot understand why this
    Message 1 of 2 , Nov 29 8:55 AM

      ---------- Forwarded message ----------
      From: Westcott2006@...
      To: Westcott2006@...
      Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:32:27 EST
      Subject: From Birther Bruce

      I cannot understand why this "president", knowing full well of the international controversy and national concern regarding his actual, factual place of birth, doesn't just come out and address this issue armed with conclusive proof of.........his birth!
      It is bad enough that we cannot get a real name, school grades, or a certified passport from this guy. 
      This is, after all, a Constitutional question issue for this Constitutional lawyer/professor to fully address square on - like a man that the Commander-In-Chief is supposed to be.   
      My questions are: 1) Why doesn't someone in the kiss-up, chicken-ass White House Press Corps ask the question of the president directly (What? you won't be invited to state dinners?), and 2) what is the deal about not closing at least this chapter of a failed and deceptive presidency, and doing so right now?
      "Birther" Bruce Westcott
      Do You Want The Truth?
      Note to everyone: This is the very first response that I received regarding this post:
      "Bruce, this turd was never a law professor, don't be fooled by this sycophant media. He lectured a law discussion class once a week at the University of Illinois in Chicago.
      I don't know the status of his law license, but his wife Michelle let her license expire, so she wouldn't be brought up on malfeasance charges by the Illinois Bar.
      We have a criminal for our president, he should either show proof of birth, or leave by way of a trial with every co- conspirator swinging."

      On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...> wrote:

      Answer to SUBPOENA is now PAST DUE:


      That Obama is an "officer of the United States"
      assumes facts not in evidence.  18 U.S.C. 912:


      Sincerely yours,
      /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
      Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
      Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
      http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
      http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

      All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.