Re: America Sold out to China by Clinton
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@...>
Subject: Re: America Sold out to China by Clinton
To: "Jim Dombroski" <lockski@...>, rick@...
Cc: "SupremeLaw" <supremelaw@...>, paulandrewmitchell2004@...
Date: Saturday, February 28, 2009, 4:26 AM> The written agreement was brought to Beijing by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and was formalized and agreed-to during her recent trip to China.
Not an "Act of Congress": 1 U.S.C. 101:
She was not "appointed" by impostor Obama,
because he is not a lawful occupant of the Oval Office:
My office is now obligated by 18 U.S.C. 4 to lodge a
VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, ON INFORMATION
formally charging Obama et al. with the violations
p.s. There is much additional (and free) reading
at the links below my name here ...
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
Our condensed list of IRS outreach resources:
http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/nutshell.htm <-- START HERE
DISCLAIMER: Forwarding email from someone else
does not mean that I endorse any of its contents.On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Jim Dombroski <lockski@...> wrote:
Paul, I just received this,
It is unconstitutional to take property from one class of people for the purpose of giving it to another class of people. I would consider this treason. Don't we hang people for treason?
IF THIS INFORMATION IS TRUE, WE'RE IN DEEP 'DOO DOO'. We need to formulate a counter plan against this treasonous act by SOS Clinton. Please share with everyone you know.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rick Jackson <rick@semolive. com <mailto:rick@...> >
Date: Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:57 PM
Subject: Fw: Sold out to China
To: Abel <abelo_az@yahoo. com <mailto:abelo_az@...> >, Addie Nakamura <redfox43@gmail. com <mailto:redfox43@...> >, bob! <bob@...>, DiAndra Halliburton <bronx404@yahoo. com <mailto:bronx404@...> >, Jim <mtview@maunga. org <mailto:mtview@...> >, Jose Rey <yahseph@gmail. com <mailto:yahseph@...> >, Larry Dees <smilnsam@hotmail. com <mailto:smilnsam@...> >, lenawlfk@ca. rr.com <mailto:lenawlfk@...> , nancy moy <nancym88@yahoo. com <mailto:nancym88@...> >, nolo@mpocenter. org <mailto:nolo@...> , Phillp Hanson <pjsbb@duluthmn. com <mailto:pjsbb@...> >, r33dy@..., rainbow4jeanne@ yahoo.com <mailto:rainbow4jeanne@...> , Ray <cashr@midwest. net <mailto:cashr@...> >, Roy Baker <bakeroy@gmail. com <mailto:bakeroy@...> >, Sandy Camden <camdensrblt2004@ yahoo.com <mailto:camdensrblt2004@...> >, RE G <regulator05@ gmail.com <mailto:regulator05@...> >, RANDY JENKINS <brandij1@windstream .net <mailto:brandij1@...> >, Randy Jenkins <babyjenks@alltel. net <mailto:babyjenks@...> >, rainbow4eanne@ yahoo.com <mailto:rainbow4eanne@...>
----- Original Message ---
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 4:35 PM
Subject: Sold out to China
February 26, 2009
FEDS GRANT EMINENT DOMAIN AS COLLATERAL TO CHINA FOR U.S. DEBTS !!!!
<http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/fraud/us_government/news.php?q=1235700773> http://www.fourwind s10.com/siterun_ data/government/ fraud/us_ government/ news.php? q=1235700773 <http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/fraud/us_government/news.php?q=1235700773>
Beijing, China -- Sources at the United States Embassy in Beijing China have just CONFIRMED to me that the United States of America has tendered to China a written agreement which grants to the People's Republic of China, an option to exercise Eminent Domain <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eminent_domain> within the USA, as collateral for China's continued purchase of US Treasury Notes and existing US Currency reserves!
The written agreement was brought to Beijing by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and was formalized and agreed-to during her recent trip to China.
This means that in the event the US Government defaults on its financial obligations to China, the Communist Government of China would be permitted to physically take -- inside the USA -- land, buildings, factories, perhaps even entire cities - to satisfy the financial obligations of the US government.
Put simply, the feds have now actually mortgaged the physical land and property of all citizens and businesses in the United States. They have given to a foreign power, their Constitutional power to "take" all of our property, as actual collateral for continued Chinese funding of US deficit spending and the continued carrying of US national debt.
This is an unimaginable betrayal of every man, woman and child in the USA. An outrage worthy of violent overthrow.
I am endeavoring to obtain images or copies of the actual document but in the interim, several different sources both in the US and in China have CONFIRMED this to me.
More details as they become available. . . . . spread the word ASAP.
------------ -- UPDATE 1:40 pm EST
Eminent Domain is the power of government to TAKE private property for public use without the consent of the property owner. Under our Constitution, the government can only "take" when providing "just compensation" for what they've taken.
Who decides what constitutes "just compensation? " The government!
Homeowners who felt the government was not paying them enough for property in past "takings" have filed lawsuits. In absolutely every such case, the value placed upon the property by the government was upheld by the courts.
Our federal government has now granted to China, this power to "take"our homes and businesses in the event the US Gov't defaults on its debts. Let's play this out as a worst case scenario. . . . . .
The US Gov't goes belly-up and China comes in and says, "they owed us $2 Trillion in Treasury Notes and another $2 Trillion in actual cash money which is now worthless. We are taking the entire state of Hawaii and the entire state of California in lieu of this bad debt. "
With the stroke of a Chinese chop stick, Hawaii and California -- all the land and buildings in those states -- are now owned by China.
The "taking" would be a "valid public use" because it was "taken" in payment of the public debt!!!!
China could then turn around and declare the value of all that land to be worth. . . . . I dunno, ten cents on a dollar?
For your $200,000 house, you get a Chinese check for $20,000.
Needless to say, the property owners would go ballistic and demand "just compensation" for what was taken. Who gets to decide what is "just?" China! Don't think you got a fair price for what they took? No problem, sue China.
People who live in those states and own their land outright, might be able to negotiate with China to "rent" back their own property, as long as the property owner continued to pay all his taxes; but the land and buildings would belong to China!
This is what our own Government has just done to us and it is the single most vile act of betrayal in the history of human existence.
------------ - SECOND UPDATE 3:48 PM
In early February nine U.S. States began the process of re-asserting their Sovereignty pursuant to the Ninth and Tenth Amendments to the US Constitution; declaring null and void any actions by Congress that violated the Constitution.
At the time, I wrote about those state efforts (Here <http://halturnershow.blogspot.com/2009/02/something-big-is-happening-9-us-states.html> ) and wondered why so many states were taking-up such an arcane issue in such a seemingly urgent fashion. I guess now, we know why.
The states were obviously privy to what the feds were planning to do with granting Eminent Domain to China. The states took action to make certain the feds couldn't give away cities or the states themselves!
This situation is going to get VERY ugly, VERY fast as one sovereign power (the feds) try to literally give away the land of other sovereign powers, (the states). This is the type of thing that starts Civil War.
Our present federal government makes the treachery and betrayal of Benedict Arnold look like child's play.
Posted by HalTurnerShow. com <http://halturnershow.com/> at 2/26/2009 12:54:00 PM <http://halturnershow.blogspot.com/2009/02/feds-grant-eminent-domain-as-collateral.html>
halturnershow. blogspot. com/2009/ 02/feds-grant- eminent-domain- as-collateral. html <http://halturnershow.blogspot.com/2009/02/feds-grant-eminent-domain-as-collateral.html>
No direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937)
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice